-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

"GET OUTDOORS USA!" - An American Recreation Coalition  brand name that provides you, the customer, with a  wide range of Disneyfied, Pay-to-Play, Edu-, Eco- and  Wreckre- tainment products, goods and services."

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Land management arrow Forest Service Implements "Proof of Concept" Model
Forest Service Implements "Proof of Concept" Model
Written by Scott Silver   
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
Late in 2007 three forests, the Colville in Washington State, the Allegheny in Pennsylvania and the Shasta-Trinity in California,  began implementation of a new Proof of Concept business model. It should be looked upon as being another "demonstration program" -- perhaps similar to the "Recreation Fee Demonstration Program."
 
Pasted below is a short statement from the Forest Service announcing this program for the Colville NF and providing links to relevant documentation. Below that is an article from the Colville newspaper.
 
I've reviewed these materials and concluded that the "Proof of Concept" concept is worthy of careful monitoring by the conservation community.
 
There is, I suppose, the possibility of true benefits accruing from this experimental new business model.  Then again, there is the possibility that it is an attempt to revisit the kind of local control characteristic of the Reagan-era Sagebrush Rebellion. That's what it looks like to me.
 
Have a look at this ... and see what you think of it.
 
Scott
 
 
   "A major benefit of this pilot project is that Colville
   National Forest will have a stable budget, with many
   exciting grant and partnership opportunities. Proof of
   Concept is considered an innovative approach to public
   lands management and it was with some pride that Rick
   Brazell told us that Colville was expressly chosen because
   of its strong partnership with community and a high level
   of community involvement."

 

--- begin quoted --- 

Newsroom - Proof of Concept

Colville National Forest is one of three forests in the nation that will implement a new business model called Proof of Concept, beginning on October 1st. Proof of Concept describes a trial period used to verify that a concept or theory is feasible. The concept behind this model suggests that through collaboration with the public and a predictable budget, the agency can increase managed outcomes while decreasing overall costs. Unless otherwise noted these are Adobe PDF documents with file sizes in parentheses.

 

 
 
BY DANI BULL -  S-E Staff Reporter
 
   Colville National Forest, along with the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in Northern California and the Allegheny Forest in Northwestern Pennsylvania, are participating in a new “Proof of Concept” business model for 2008  that will continue for the next 10 years.
 
   The trial was scheduled to begin Oct. 1.  The trial is based on a business model embracing collaboration with the public and a five-year “predictable budget.” The objective for the forest agencies is to increase productivity while decreasing overall costs.
 
   “Proof of Concept is the actual trial period used to ascertain if the program will be feasible or not,” Don Gonzalez, Ecosystem Planning and Monitoring staff member with the Colville National Forest explained. 
 
   “The objectives of the Proof of Concept model allows for greater public involvement,” added Gonzalez. “Long-term collaboration versus current one-year contract limits, due to yearly budget fluctuations, will create a more flexible and economically viable forest department budget.”
 

Stable five-year budget benefits the program
 
   There are multiple benefits expected from the new business model.
 
   “The stable five-year budget should, in theory, increase stewardship contracts and partnerships along with predictable work opportunities for community members and contractors,”  Gonzalez explained. “The changes should promote better collaboration while increasing program efficiency and decreasing overall costs.”
 
   The new business model was formed because the Forest Service has been experiencing increasing program requirements that continue to exceed budget allocations and workforce capacities.
 
   The business model that was designed is expected to accomplish forest projects and required objectives with improved efficiency. Increasing management flexibility with longer-term goals is more likely obtainable with five-year fixed budget parameters, Gonzales said.
 
   “Public input, including past partnerships and previous collaboration efforts and workshops, will be used in the setting of program goals by management,”  Gonzales explained.  “Local interest will enhance the decisions and improve outcomes.  The outline will highlight five-year goals with yearly flexibility for adapting those goals and continuing in an ongoing five-year goal outline.”
 
 
Long-term accomplishments 
 
   “The National Strategic Plan, the Forest Plan and the law are parameters the plan must follow as well.  Including the public in the evaluations and yearly reviews with public meetings will assist managers in monitoring the plan,” said Gonzalez.
 
   The model will be monitored and evaluated by the Regional Forester and the Washington office.  Progress toward long-term goals will be reviewed with the mission of the Forest Service of “caring for the land and serving the people,” according to Gonzalez.
 
   The proof of concept process began for the Colville National Forest with CNF representatives meeting county commissioners from Stevens, Ferry and Pend Oreille Counties.
 
   The categories discussed included noxious weed reduction and control, grazing management, wild land urban interface fuels reductions, commercial forest products management, wildfire prevention and control, timber stand improvements, wildlife and fisheries habitat improvements, recreation services and heritage management and lands, minerals and infrastructure management.
 
   Outlines of what each category consisted of were given to participants with CNF levels currently budgeted to that particular category.
 
   “Colville Forest Supervisor, Rick Brazell, analyzed the input from the public meetings, commissioners, tribal representatives and made recommendations for the budget based on that input,” said Gonzalez.

 

Comments (2) >>

Susan Hobbs said:

  In the NE corner of Washington State, a economically disadvantaged county of 11,700 citizens are neighbor to the Colville National Forest. The Proof of Concept meeting arranged by the USFS and the Board of County Commissioners was held in November '07, with the stated intention of gathering as much input from community as conceivable.

Why then was the site chosen for the community input in a town 55 miles from the county seat? Why was the site for the meeting filled with OHV enthusiasts? The make-up per table, in a room holding no more than sixty, was stocked with OHV club members & enthusiasts 2, if not 3 to 1, including USFS personnel who are themselves OHV enthusiasts.

In writing Betty Higgins, Supervisor of the Colville National Forest, she explained that the meeting site was chosen by the county commissioners of Pend Oreille County. This is no surprise.

It's Proof of Nothing if the data and participation is manipulated to serve an agenda. It is not the public agenda, but the OHV group's, and financially strapped county commissioners back door dealing, intentionally eliminating participation by non-OHV citizenry.

With real Winters, asking a percentage of the 6,000 citizens in the county seat 55 miles away to risk icy roads to participate ended up serving the OHV agenda well.

But it doesn't serve public lands or future generations; not one bit.
February 12, 2008

Susan Hobbs said:

  A correction: The name of the U.S.F.S. forester overseeing the Colville from Portland Oregon is Linda Goodman, not Betty Higgins.

If you'd like to write Ms. Goodman and share your concerns before her retirement in March, please do so at:

Linda Goodman
Regional Forester District 6
333 SW First Avenue
Portland, OR 97204

Also, FYI.. The meetings held in Ferry and Stevens County were not sited to exclude participation. The choice of remote meeting location was particular to Pend Oreille County, where participation was utterly dissimilar to a normal cross-section of OHV/Non-OHV enthusiasts within population.
February 16, 2008
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v4.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.