-or GOOGLE our full site -
Heads Up!
Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations
BLOG CONTENT
OLDER CONTENT
|
HOME - Land management Groups Appeal Grand Canyon Ruling
|
Groups Appeal Grand Canyon Ruling |
|
Written by Guest; RIVERWIRE
|
|
Friday, 11 January 2008 |
|
RRFW Riverwire
Groups Appeal GC Ruling on Park's 100th Birthday
January 11, 2008
Four conservation groups filed an appeal today to the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals as part of their on-going effort to protect and
restore the Grand Canyon's natural sounds and wilderness values from
motorized and commercial uses.
The groups, which include River Runners for Wilderness, Rock the Earth,
Living Rivers and Wilderness Watch, claim the National Park Service's
new management plan for the Colorado River corridor which authorizes
motorboat use and helicopter passenger exchanges in the heart of the
Grand Canyon is inconsistent with National Park Service obligations to
preserve the area's wilderness character.
The groups challenged the National Park Service's management plan in
Federal District Court in 2006, claiming that the Park's own policies
require managing the canyon as wilderness. They also claimed that the
National Park Service illegally granted the majority of river access to
commercial concessionaires thereby forcing members of the general
public to wait years for a chance to obtain a permit to float the
Colorado River.
In November 2007, U.S. District Court Judge David G. Campbell upheld
the National Park Service's new river management plan. Intervening in
defense of the Park's plan were the Grand Canyon Private Boaters
Association and the Grand Canyon River Outfitters Trade Association.
The groups' appeal comes on the 100th anniversary of President Theodore
Roosevelt's declaring the Grand Canyon a National Monument on January
11, 1908.
A century ago, President Roosevelt proclaimed, "We have gotten past the
stage, my fellow-citizens, when we are to be pardoned if we treat any
part of our country as something to be skinned for two or three years
for the use of the present generation, whether it is the forest, the
water, the scenery. Whatever it is, handle it so that your children's
children will get the benefit of it."
George Nickas, Executive Director of Wilderness Watch, builds on that
commitment to protection. "No doubt Teddy Roosevelt would be appalled
if he were here today and saw how the park service has commercialized
the Grand Canyon and allowed the song of the canyon wren to be drowned
by the racket of outboard motors."
Tom Martin, Co-Director of River Runners for Wilderness agrees.
"President Roosevelt was forced to strongly defend his Grand Canyon
proclamation against repeated opposition all the way to the Supreme
Court. One hundred years later, we are in a similar fight and likewise
determined to win the best possible protection for Grand Canyon's
Colorado River" added Martin.
"What's at stake is incredibly important to all Americans. Not only is
public access to our public spaces, without the need to pay
concessionaires thousands of dollars, at issue," noted Marc Ross,
Executive Director of Rock the Earth, "but also the idea that there
needs to be places where one can go in this country to seek peace and
solitude without hearing the roar of engines."
The groups are represented by Julia Olson of Wild Earth Advocates and Matthew Bishop of the Western Environmental Law Center.
RIVERWIRE is a free service to the community of river lovers from River
Runners for Wilderness. To join, send an e-mail address to
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
with "join Riverwire" in the subject line and we'll
add it to the RRFW RIVERWIRE e-mail alerts list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of
criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use'
of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes. |
|
|
|