-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Outdoor recreation arrow A Contrarian View of ATVs
A Contrarian View of ATVs
Written by Scott Silver   
Monday, 27 August 2007

For the longest while, pro-off-road vehicle interest groups have promoted the PR-message which says there is nothing inherently wrong with off-roading and whatever problems are associated with the activity can all be attributed to "the few bad apples" who fail to follow the rules and, by so doing, spoil it for everyone else. That's the "Tread Lightly" message and it has served the motorized recreation community well.

More recently, the conservation community began using a remarkably similar message. According to their newly adopted frame, "Everyone has a right to access our public lands, but no one has the right to abuse these lands or ruin the experience of others enjoying America's Great Outdoors."  That's really not very different from the Tread Lightly message, is it?

With there being so little difference in the way both sides of the motorized recreation issue frame their messaging, I found the appended article from Alberta Canada refreshing. It offers a stark, and presumably heart-felt, contrast to the carefully managed, professionally crafted, sterile messages that now dominates all discussion of this issue.

Scott
 

--- begin quoted ---

August 18, 2007
Burying the facts does not eliminate the truth about off road vehicles on public lands
Guest Article by Brian L. Horejsi


Crimes against the land, crimes against our streams and rivers and wetlands, crimes against clean air, crimes against fish, wildlife and birds, crimes against wild plants, crimes against soil, crimes against quiet and solitude, crimes against peaceful non motorized public lands users; the list goes on and on. All crimes documented by scientific, social and public lands management evidence. That is the legacy of off road vehicles and their users, not just in Alberta, but across North America.

This is one crime spree that most Albertans do not have their heads in the sand about; no fairy tale ostrich impersonations here except in the blinkered self-serving world of off road users. Albertans are fed up with this bunch; all that remains for the people of Alberta to do is clear out a government and the old boys network of land managers that are protecting off roaders. It is probably more accurate to say protecting manufacturers and dealers – the money people - who act as the pushers for the addicts – the gloriously self endowed “enthusiasts” that desecrate public lands. These are the people that are fueling the destruction of the natural and real recreational world.

The core group of off roaders are notorious machine and party idolizing young males best characterized as environmental deadbeats. Most are abysmally poorly informed about the destruction they and their machines impose on the landscape. The majority fancy themselves immune to responsibility, as are the manufacturers and dealers. The latter are the people who provide the money, they hook “the clubs”, who Minister Morton apparently wants to “work with”. These almost private deals take place outside the political and public process, in the backrooms, where the money men curry political favoritism. The fact is Morton, and this government, have no legal, moral, ethical or democratic authority to give off road “clubs” preferential treatment; Morton and Stelmachs moral, legal and scientific responsibility is to implement a high level of protection for all public land, native biological diversity, water, and the collective public interest. That is their one and only obligation.

There’s something offensive about the defense employed by off roaders when they take the position that “it must be OK because I do it”. Its analogous to a child locking itself in the closet to escape reality. It resembles a deck that’s short 51 cards. The reality is, it is NOT OK; off road vehicles on public land are never OK.

There is a carefully and monotonously cultivated misconception by off roader spokespersons that its only the bad guys that cause the conflicts, the disruption and the damage. Dead wrong. The fact is that there is no acceptable form of off road motorized use of public lands. It matters not whether its “the bad bunch” or those who consider themselves immune to criticism. Any off road vehicle on public land brings unacceptable impacts; No government can justify crimes that lead to land destruction and the destruction of true, solitude based non motorized recreational experiences; no government has the moral or legal right to sacrifice public resources and the majority of public land users for mindless, obnoxious destructive activities fraudulently labeled as outdoor recreation.

I have sat high on the top of a hard gained ridge in Albertas foothills and been forced to endure the incessant whine, drone and buzz of off road vehicles obliterating the entire drainage, stealing from me solitude, any sense of time and place, the sound of wind and bird, the value and reward of something hard earned, destroying the very essence of what the outdoors means to the mind and spirit of humans. I have watched as adults and children, the latter on down-sized off road vehicles, ravaged the gravel bars, banks and fish habitat of a clear, gently flowing fresh river, engaged in the mindless churning up of fine particles and gouging the river floor; Could this be the deceptively touted family outing to teach children respect for of the outdoors and its wild inhabitants? As A wildlife scientist, I am alarmed by the indifference, the ignorance, and the arrogance of off roaders whose activities and mere presence alarm and often terrify deer, elk, bears and all other forms of wildlife, leading in some cases to death, to reduced reproduction, to injury and separation of young and adults, to extra energy costs, to flight and displacement from preferred habitat and to reduced energy intake and lower body weights, almost all of which are unseen to casual observers. Off roaders, of course, are not there to watch wildlife and they never see those animals that fled in advance of their appearance.

There’s also something offensive, and deeply disturbing, about government agents, whether they be conservation, forest or police officers, who treat off road crimes as though they were “folksy” offenses. There are too many cases in history where intimidation of the law, democracy, and the public breeds anarchy. Mob rule is a threat to any honest decent society hoping to achieve some level of democracy, and only full democracy will protect public processes and public assets like out Public land. Destroying the ecological integrity of streams and fish habitat, terrorizing wild animals, shredding vegetation, polluting the air, offending non motorized peaceful users of public land, mocking the public, intimidating law enforcement, and belittling scientifically and ecologically sound land conservation are not “folksy”. What they are is lawless and those who trivialize these activities, particularly those in the presumed role of authority, are betraying the public.

In a land that is unfortunately renowned for private control of resources, it is a paradox that virtually no private land owner will tolerate off roaders “enthusiasts” on his or her land. Its interesting that these people are not prepared to tolerate the destruction and abuse that off roaders bring; apparently they can see the emperor has no clothes. Are Ted Morton and this government willfully blind to the onslaught?

In the last twenty years the Alberta government and government agents in what is now deceptively labeled Sustainable Resource Management have abandoned the protection of public lands and the will and vision of the people of Alberta and sunk into an unholy alliance with motorized industrialization of public land. The engage in fraudulent attempts at reform, as in the shape of “workbooks” designed to contain and restrict public input, as is the case in the ongoing round of land use “plans”; dare not go to full legislated public hearings because democracy might break loose. No small wonder this government and the premiers public support are in the gutter, or should I say mud bog. It is long past time that Albertans seize control of our land and reclaim our democracy; A critical and significant step toward that end is to provide all public lands total protection from all forms of motorized destruction at all times, in perpetuity.

Comments (5) >>

Greg said:

  Brian sounds a bit close to a meltdown, I hope he does not spit out this bitter anger if he needs to get rescued someday, 5 miles in backcountry with a sprained ankle, and along comes a family on ATVs, that have extra water and food along.

I am not an ATVer, but they are part of the recreation public, they are very organized and belong to clubs, and they are numerous and speak with organized voices. The land management agencies that have a misson that includes access and public recreation cannot just ban ATVs, they have to negoiated the fine line between resource protection and the needs of the public. And it is a difficult task for land management agencies, as the public is somewhat selfish, they all want access for their type of recreation, and some do not share very well...like Brian shows in the above comment.,,
September 03, 2007

larry said:

  i agree with greg. this guy scott is the example of environmental fascism if ive ever seen it.who made this guy and the sierra club the moral authority to speak for all americans on public lands issues. these clubs and snott are simple environmental terrorists pushing their prejudice and hate upon anyone who doesnt agree with their hippy, tree hugging, no toilet paper using, sick immoral views. wake up people because now its vehicles, then these sickos are going to close all the land to anyone but their nasty kind. i am from az and so much land is closed to recreation now because of miserable lowlifes like scott. all of his kind need to stay out of the west. i love nature and even go bird watching, but who the hell are you, snotty, to tell me i cant drive my atv or jeep responsibly to a nice hide out in the woods. your kind make me sick, snott,and there is going to be a revolution soon. americans are getting sick of nasty little nazis like you pushing your hate and eco-tyrany on them.you dont see off roaders putting wire across a road like you did at baja. keep pushing the people.
October 27, 2007

Steve said:

  Sorry previous commenters, Brian Horejsi is dead on, especially about Alberta. Comments to the contrary are typically uninformed. Particularly in Alberta, the 'rural' town-bred overweight types never, ever walk anywhere. They ride ATVs. To the post office. Around the block. Around and around and around in circles. Teens, in particular, can't seem to snap out of the throttle-twisting hypnosis. They'll punch their ATVs everywhere they can possibly get them in the backcountry, legal or not. The average Alberta ATV has a winch on the front and a chainsaw on the back. The chainsaw is for downed logs and restriction signs, which are routinely defaced, in Alberta as in "Arizona" where "Larry" lives. Well I live in the West. I was born here. And I'm here to stay. Currently I live in Southern Utah, in a town of 140. Virtually ZERO public land is 'closed to recreation,' in the U.S. A small percentage of it is still(thankfully) closed to jeepers, ATVers, and bullet-slingers (i.e. hunters). While not all ATVers are irresponsible, destructive clowns, I'd say a solid 40% are, and they do a ton of long-lasting damage. I'd contend that 25% to 30% of total ATVers are militant anti-environmentalists who automatically assume that it's their 'right' to ride illegally everywhere they think they can get away with it. They think they're real outdoorsmen, but they're soft, lazy, domesticated, two-legged livestock. Nothing more. "Americans are sick of nasty little nazis like you pushing...eco-tyranny." Think again, Larry. Most Americans are disgusted with the ATV crowd. And that includes many, many rural Westerners.
December 09, 2007

Jeff said:

  Mabye you would have a problem with pumping all the oil and mining all the coal out of mother earth? Mabye you would do away with the OZONE layer and melt the ice caps? Mabye you should get your priorities straight and leave the ATV's alone, worry about the bird flu you moron.
March 26, 2008

Travis said:

  I agree with Larry and Steve, I am sick of this eco-terrorism that we are experiencing, worry about something else......
June 26, 2008
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v4.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.