-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Activism arrow Be careful what you wish for
Be careful what you wish for
Written by Guest: George Nickas   
Thursday, 02 August 2007

There's an old saying about "being careful what you wish for...."  When communities throughout the West decide that their economy is dependent on recreation their reaction won't be to preserve wild places, wildness or other "non-economic" values.  Instead, it will be on promoting policies and schemes to exploit wild lands to make the most recreation dollars.  it won't be pretty.  It will continue the ruination of wildness and other values most of us hold dear, and that future generations may never know.  The "new economy" (really the same old dance, just different partners) is gobbling up the "last best places" just as fast as--and probably more permanently than--any of the old economies.

One doesn't have to read a lot of conservation history to learn that our forebearers in this movement understood that wildlands are doomed if they're forced to "serve the economy."  As John Muir warned, "Nothing dollarable is safe."  There's a reason the Wilderness Act, for example, prohibits all commercial enterprise, even relatively benign ones.  The law made an exception for outfitters and guides ("commercial services") and Wilderness is increasingly suffering for that.  It slays me, then, that so many of our conservation colleagues want to promote public lands as economic engines rather than as sources of clean air, clean water, wildlife security, and inspiration for the human soul.  Why do these lands have to serve the economy, especially this economy, which is incredibly unsustainable?

I believe that recreation, especially quiet, muscle-powered contemplative recreation, is good for human beings.  Nothing better than a walk in the woods.  But it's not good for anything else.  We displace wildlife, trample soil, crush vegetation, all the while consuming massive amounts of hydrocarbons and other materials to make the "stuff" we use to recreate and to get "out there" in our cars.  Without a very strong measure of restraint we six billion humans--and counting--will consume it all, even while engaged in seemingly benign activities like going for a walk in the woods or wending our way down a slickrock canyon.  I'm sad to say that I see nothing about restraint in this news release from the Sierra Club (see appended).  I only see rah-rah cheers promoting the increasing unsustainable "wreckreation" juggernaut that will, sure as any modern-day economy that came before, destroy what's best about our public lands, while continuing our lifestyles' ravish consumption of planet Earth.

George Nickas
Executive Director
Wilderness Watch

--- begin quoted ---

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 1, 2007
Contact: Kristina Johnson (415) 977-5619


New Report Documents Shift in Economy of the American West Communities Rely More on Recreation and Less on Mining, Timber and Oil


A new report released by the Sierra Club today shows that the economics of the West have shifted dramatically over the past few decades. Mining, timber, and oil--the industries that shaped the old West--no longer drive the region?s economy. Today, the report finds, recreational activities like camping, fishing, hunting, skiing, climbing, and boating support more sustainable jobs and economic growth than extractive industries.

The report, "The New Economy of the West: From Clearcutting to Camping," shows that increasingly, western communities depend on public lands for jobs, economic growth, and vitality.

Some key findings in the report:

-     One in twenty Americans rely in some manner on outdoor recreation to make a living

-     In 2006, outdoor recreation in the West generated $61 billion and 617,186 new jobs

-     Communities that are closest to federally-protected public lands show the strongest economic growth

Despite their importance to the regional and national economy, today, western public lands face threats from many fronts. Oil and gas drilling, runaway logging, and global warming all jeopardize the future of recreation in the West, and the long-term economic benefits that accompany it.

Oil drilling, for example, fragments wildlife habitat and destroys hunting opportunities. By and large, the report shows, the oil industry imports highly-skilled workers from other parts of the country, employing few local workers. Oil companies also turn to counties to fund services like road repairs and waste disposal, while doing little to boost jobs and income locally. Meanwhile, recreation and tourism provide a long-term, locally-based source of jobs and income. In Colorado?s Roan Plateau, hunting alone generates nearly $4 million a year.

"Our public lands are one of our nation?s most valuable economic assets," said Sierra Club Conservation Organizer Keren Murphy, who authored the report. "The economy of the West has changed, and so should the way we manage it."

"Public lands drive the tourist-based economies in our western states. If we protect special places like Colorado?s Roan Plateau and New Mexico?s Valle Vidal, they?ll provide a source of income and enjoyment for generations to come," Murphy said.

"The heart of America?s wild legacy lies in the forests, mountains and deserts of the West. Unchecked logging, oil drilling and mining no longer have a place on our last remaining wild lands. We have a choice to make, between treating our public lands as a giveaway to special interests, or as a gift to our children and grandchildren."

To view the report, click here, or call Kristina Johnson at (415) 977-5619 to request a copy.


Kristina Johnson
Associate Press Secretary
Sierra Club
Office: (415) 977-5619
Cell: (541) 914-9744
85 Second Street - 2nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3459
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Comments (1) >>

Sarah Chisholm said:

  I read Nickas' piece with great interest. Here in the Sierra Nevada (where the Sierra Club used to pay some attention, before it moved on to bigger issues), the recreation industry is wrecking our wilderness. The Forest Service has allowed the horse/mule industry to expand greatly, resulting in pulverized dusty trails, polluted water (see reference below), trampled meadows, and manure plastered campsites. In response to the impacts, the Forest Service then reduced the trailhead quotas on individual hikers while the commercial enterprises continue to expand with no seeming limits. This is what our western communities will see lots more of if we blindly embrace recreation as some kind of saving grace.

I hadn't heard of Wilderness Watch before, but i checked their website and see that they are trying to address the abuse of our public lands by recreation enterprises (not encouraging it like the Sierra Club). I'm going to join WW and quit the SC !!

Thanks to Wild Wilderness for this enlightening blog.

Sarah

Reference
smilies/grin.giferlet, RW, and JR Carlson. 2006. Coliform Bacteria in Sierra Nevada Wilderness Lakes and Streams: What Is the Impact of Backpackers, Pack Animals, and Cattle? Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 17:15-20. (Concludes, in part: "...pack animals are most likely the source of coliform pollution.")
August 24, 2007
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v20.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.