-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow Your recreation pass is worthless
Your recreation pass is worthless
Written by Scott Silver   
Friday, 29 June 2007

Almost daily I am hearing from or about people who having paid $30, $50, $80, $95 or more for a federally issued public lands recreation pass, and who have just discovered that their pass doesn't provide the access they expected. Let me explain what's going on.

Private concessionaires are not required to accept the America the Beautiful Pass or the Golden Age Pass, Adventure Pass, Tonto Pass, Red Rock Pass, etc. for general access or use — and they have no reason to do so.  When a land management agency privatizes a recreation site, be it a picnic area, a boat launch, swimming beach, etc. by turning it over to a concessionaire, that site is no longer freely accessible to citizens or visitors. The concessionaire, being in the business of providing recreation for a profit,  will demand payment for access and will expect payment in the form of cash, check or credit card. Passes issued by the government are not accepted forms of currency.

And as profitable recreation sites are being privatized,  unprofitable recreation sites are being closed or, as the USFS prefers to say, they are simply not being opened for the season.  I've blogged on this phenomenon already twice this week and, be assured,  this trend is rapidly accelerating.

Pasted below yet another, somewhat different, illustration of what's going on. In this example, a hiker who having purchased a Tonto National Forest recreation pass for $95 discoverers that site where he wanted to hike on Tuesday was closed and off-limits between sundown on Sunday and Friday at 4:00 PM.

As outdoor recreation on our public lands is transformed from being a benefit of citizenship to being a revenue generating commodity, optimized for profitability, please understand that if a recreation site or opportunity doesn't pay, chances are it is going away.

Scott 

June 15, 2007
Closure irks Tonto Forest area hiker
Lauren Gilger, Tribune

For the last three years, Scottsdale resident Tim Jacobson has gone hiking with his dogs at Coon Bluff, a public recreation area along the Salt River northeast of Mesa.

He even recently bought a $95 annual parking pass to be able to go there year-round.

But when he arrived with his dogs at the gate last week, he found it locked. No sign, no notice given. When he came back again last Friday, he said the site was still closed.

Tonto National Forest officials blame the restricted hours on staffing shortages.

Recreation sites at Coon Bluff, Phon D Sutton, Sheep’s Crossing and Pebble Beach now close at sundown on Sunday until 4 p.m. the following Friday each week, according to an announcement on the Forest Service’s Web site.

“The information is out there,” said Art Wirtz, district ranger with the Mesa Ranger District of the Tonto National Forest. “I don’t know if they’re aware of it.”

Wirtz said the district is short about 10 staff members, and it doesn’t have enough people available to pick up litter and patrol the areas. He said the Forest Service is trying to stretch the staff it has by using them on weekends when most people visit the river.

But Jacobson is skeptical.

“I’ve never seen anyone from the Forest Service out there picking up garbage in the three years I’ve been going there,” he said.

Wirtz said the recent shortages are due to what he called the “growing pains” of a new system, in which the 156 Forest Service personnel offices around the country were centralized into one office in Albuquerque, N.M.

Wirtz said the Forest Service hopes to be able to reopen the recreation areas along the Salt River in a few months.

In the meantime, Jacobson is upset that the closures don’t apply equally to everybody.

While driving home last week, he said he noticed a private charter bus entering one of the closed areas. After questioning Forest Service officials, he learned that some businesses receive exclusive access to the recreation areas while the public is shut out.

Wirtz defends the special-use permits given to some businesses.

He said a significant amount of money made by those businesses goes back to the government, and some of the money helps maintain those sites.

“Yes, tax dollars did build all of these recreation sites,” he said. “But the money to maintain and operate them doesn’t necessarily come from taxpayers.”

He also pointed out that private tour companies serve the public, who otherwise would not be able to river raft with trained guides.

“The public are the ones that are using it,” Wirtz said.

Jacobson’s other complaint is that the Forest Service did not mention that parking lot hours would soon be restricted when he bought his parking pass. He said the three recreation areas that remain open during the week are crowded by customers and buses from the Salt River Tubing company.

Wirtz said the Forest Service now tells people when they buy their parking permits that some areas are closed five days a week.

In the end, Jacobson said he just wants public access to public land.

“What law gives you the authority to close public land off to the public?” he asked.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v19.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.