-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Activism arrow The Criminal and the ARC
The Criminal and the ARC
Written by Scott Silver   
Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Convicted felon J. Steven Griles had asked that for his punishment he be permitted to work for his old friends and associates at the American Recreation Coalition.

Just moments ago, a federal judge ruled that Griles must go to prison instead.

As news of Griles' incarceration spreads, I sincerely hope that many more media outlets associate the criminal and the ARC.... as does the article which appears below.

Scott

 --- begin quoted ---

Griles gets 10 months in prison
By Mike Soraghan
June 26, 2007


The highest-ranking Bush administration official to plead guilty in connection with the Jack Abramoff investigation was sentenced to prison Tuesday, with the judge adding time because, she said, he violated the public trust.

J. Steven Griles, 59, whom Abramoff once described as “our guy” at the Department of the Interior, is to serve 10 months in prison. U.S. District Judge Ellen S. Huvelle increased the sentence from the five months laid out in Griles’s plea agreement with prosecutors.

Griles pleaded guilty in March to lying to the Senate Indian Affairs Committee about the access and influence he had given to Abramoff, a Bush “pioneer” fundraiser, on Indian casino issues.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) led the probe. Italia Federici, a former campaign aide to former Interior Secretary Gale Norton, has also pleaded guilty to lying to the committee.

Griles’s guilty plea had indicated that he would likely have to serve five months in jail. But Huvelle had warned Griles that she might not accept the prosecutors’ recommendation. The judge had also increased the sentence of former Rep. Bob Ney (R-Ohio) because of the trust placed in him as an elected official.

Griles’s attorneys had argued that a sentence of five months in prison would be too harsh, saying the crime was minor and citing their client’s history of public service. They advocated a sentence of community service to be served at the American Recreation Coalition, an industry group Griles had worked with at Interior that supports motorized recreation on public lands.

Norton wrote a letter in support of Griles and asked for leniency.

Griles’s attorneys noted that while other Abramoff defendants took money from the lobbyist, Griles had not. Griles noted that he had been invited on Abramoff’s now-infamous golf trip to Scotland with former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), but “expressly and affirmatively rejected” the offer.

Prosecutors replied that five months was a fitting punishment, and offered up new details about how Griles helped Abramoff’s Indian casino clients. They said Griles “was not shy” about seeking favors in return. The favors included asking Abramoff to raise money for the group run by Federici, then Griles’s girlfriend, and trying to get jobs at Abramoff’s firm for other women with whom he had “close, personal” relationships.

For his part, Griles berated an official who did not want to send federal school construction funds intended for poor tribes to a wealthy casino tribe that had hired Abramoff, and worked to block a casino that would compete with one of Abramoff’s clients, the brief said.

They also compared the case to that of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, who was given a two-and-a-half-year sentence for lying to investigators about the outing of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v4.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.