People camping or spending the day on Chetco River bars this summer will find
plenty of cool water and sunshine, but few toilets or trash cans.
They will also find that the U.S. Forest Service's Little Redwood campground
is closed.
The culprit? Budget cuts.
A 64-percent loss
in maintenance funds and a 20-percent cut in operational funding has forced the
Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Service to shutter 24 campgrounds, three
picnic sites and related services throughout its 1.8 million acres of national
forest.
For the Gold Beach Ranger District, which reaches from the Rogue River to the
Winchuck River, the loss of funding means no more trash or toilet services on
the Chetco River east of Loeb State Park.
The only toilet facilities now available are the toilets at Loeb and a
permanent pit toilet at Nook Bar.
Additional national forest campgrounds closed in Curry County include Illahe
Campground (between Agness and Foster Bar) on the Rogue River, and Winchuck
Campground on the Winchuck River.
People have noticed the changes.
The Curry Coastal Pilot has
received several phone calls and letters this week from people concerned about
the lack of services at their favorite spots, and what they described as an
increase in trash, particularly used toilet paper.
"This is really a disaster," said
Curry County resident Ed Gross, a former Forest Service employee who, along with
other former forest service employees, started a wilderness cleanup project this
year.
"It's a sad case of a lack of
desire to serve the public," Gross said.
Forest service officials, however, say it's a matter of money – or lack there
of.
"We received our (federal) allocations and had to adjust our services
accordingly," said John Borton, district ranger for the Gold Beach Ranger
District.
Budget woes
For the past several years, the federal government has been budgeting less
money each year to U.S. Forest Districts throughout the country.
According to its Web site, the Forest Service's proposed fiscal year 2008
budget totals $4.13 billion in discretionary appropriations, a $64.25 million
decrease from 2007.
For the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Service, which has slowly been
downsizing its staff and services in recent years, the impact is becoming more
noticeable.
Patty Burel, public affairs
officer for the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, said her regional office
saw its maintenance budget for its five districts, including Gold Beach, drop
from $212,000 in 2006 to $74,000 in 2007, a 65 percent difference.
Its operation budget – for
campgrounds, river bars and trailheads – was cut from $1.1 million in 2006 to
$879,000 in 2007 – a 20 percent difference, Burel said.
The budget for trail maintenance
went from $279,000 in 2006 to $189,000 in 2007, she said.
Still, Burel was optimistic.
"People need to know that most of the forest is still open," she said. "We
still have open 46 campgrounds, eight picnic areas, 38 day-use area and 58
trailheads."
Also, she added, the campground closures and canceled services are not
necessarily permanent.
For example, she said, her office recently received an additional $133,000
for its maintenance budget, to be spread among it's five districts. The office,
she said, is waiting for replies from district managers on where and on what
they want spend the money.
"It gives us an opportunity to add more services back," Burel said.
Additional money from federal forest-related programs might also come later
in the year and allow the districts to restore services, she said.
Curry Transfer and Recycling (CTR) Manager Pete Smart said the Forest Service
would be saving a total of $9,782 from June to September by not having the
toilets and trash cans.
Hard decisions
In deciding which national forest
campgrounds to close this year, the Forest Service developed a recreational site
master plan in which it studied day use areas, campgrounds and trails from the
Cascade Mountain Range to the coast, according to Ranger Borton.
The agency closed those with less use
than others, Borton said.
For example, the Winchuck River
Campground was closed because more people use the nearby Ludlum
Campground.
"We had to make some tough decisions, but overall most of our day use,
trailheads and campgrounds remain open," Borton said.
Also, he said, the Forest Service is not charging for camping on any of the
river bars as it has in previous years.
Borton explained that fees collected
from campers each year did not cover the costs of maintaining portable toilets
and trash service.
"We had to subsidize those
services using money from our allocation," he said.
With the trash cans gone, Borton encouraged users to pack out their trash.
"We're counting on people to be responsible and use the sites properly," he
said.
Forest Service personnel will continue to monitor the various areas along the
Chetco, Winchuck and Rogue rivers throughout the summer, cleaning up trash as
needed, Borton said.
As for going to the bathroom, he encouraged people to use the permanent
toilet facilities at Loeb State Park and Nook Bar.
Criticism
A big critic of the decision to close
the campgrounds and eliminate trash and toilet services on the Chetco River is
Jerry Darbyshire.
Darbyshire worked 30 years for the
Forest Service, the last 12 years for the Chetco Ranger District, which merged
with the Gold Beach Ranger District in 2004. He retired in October.
"It doesn't make sense," he
said. "The Chetco is designated as a wild and scenic river. Now you have trash
and human waste where people, children, are swimming. It's a health and safety
issue."
The river, he added, is know for its healthy fishery and clean water, both of
which may be impacted by trash and human waste.
Darbyshire estimated that that fees
charged for camping on the Chetco River bars and Little Redwood campground
amounted to approximately $30,000 a year, which fell short of covering the costs
of maintaining trash and toilet services.
Subsidizing the cost here and in other
Forest Service districts is not unusual – the forest service has been doing it
for years, he said.
Darbyshire acknowledged the financial
challenges the forest service has been and is still facing.
"The budget has been declining for
years, and nosedived since I retired," he said. "It's a matter of priorities,
and tough decision have to be made."
However, Darbyshire criticized the
Forest Service for what he says was a lack of communication with the public
about the changes.
"There was no public involvement," he
said. "They knew back in November this was happening, but they didn't do
anything until right before Memorial Day.
"They could have held meetings
and let the public know what they were doing and why. But they didn't do
that."
He also thinks that Gold Beach Ranger District officials are favoring the
Rogue River area over the Chetco and Winchuck river areas.
"It think there's a real discrepancy between the south end of the county and
Gold Beach," Darbyshire said, adding, "I don't think John Borton is as familiar
with the Chetco and Winchuck as he is with the Rogue. He may not realize the
impacts these decisions are having."
So what would Darbyshire do if he was still working with the forest service?
"I would look at all the campgrounds, perhaps drop some services at the more
improved campgrounds along the Rogue before closing campgrounds on the Chetco
and Winchuck," he said.
Also, he said, he would look at raising fees, especially at campgrounds along
the Rogue River.
Health and safety
Harvey Timeus, who worked for the
Chetco Ranger District for since 1971 and retired in 2004, was dismayed by the
recent cuts in services.
"In the past, we had several full-time
employees picking up trash, emptying toilets and doing law enforcement; now
there's nothing," Timeus, who oversaw and did much of that work, said. "The
forest service has thrown away 30 years of effort."
He said the cuts are the result
of dwindling funds and that most of the decisions are being made by "upper
level" management in Medford, not at the local level.
Timeus was particularly concerned about public safety because there are less
Forest Service people patrolling areas and enforcing the rules. That will be
compounded by the Curry County's current budget crises, which may lead to less
sheriff's deputies on patrol.
"There's always been a rowdy element," he said, referring to people who
disobey laws on national forest property.
And that element, he said, may go unchecked, resulting in more vandalism and
disruptions for people peaceably enjoying the forest.
As for the impact of human waste on Brookings' water quality, Brookings
Public Works Director John Cowan didn't think there would be much.
The city, he explained, gets its water from an aquifer located about 25 feet
below the river bottom and has been naturally filtered of most harmful bacteria.
But, Cowan said, there is a question of the quality of the water in the
Chetco River itself, and the ocean in which it empties, come fall, when the
first rains wash any human waste into the river.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Funkhouser" <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 7:22 AM
Subject: FS Campground Closures (RSFMP) Continue Without Public Knowledge
OREGON
All,
The Forest Service continues to close or decommission recreation
sites such as campgrounds and picnic areas without public notification or public
process under the controversial Recreation Site Facility Master Planning process
(RSFMP). The Rogue River-Siskiyou NF has closed or decommissioned 24
campgrounds, 3 picnic areas and removed an untold number of toilet facilities
and water systems.
The Curry Coastal Pilot article below outlines some of
the key issues and impacts involved. Not mentioned is that the agency has moved
ahead in implementing the RSFMP in contradiction of the RSFMP Public Process
Review Team findings. While those findings are limited in value (See WSNFC
Update Report Attached) they do insist that all forests release their RSFMP
5-Year Plans well in advance of implementation. It is also important to note
that the FS WO still has not issued any guidelines on public input on the RSFMP
including subjecting forest RSFMP 5-Year Plans to the NEPA
process.
Equally of concern is level of appropriated funding being
allocated to the forest. For Forest Service Recreation funding Congress enacted
an Continuing Resolution (CR) which appropriated the SAME LEVEL of funding for
these recreation line items in FY 2007 as was funded in FY 2006. In other words
Congress did not cut Forest Service recreation funding from FY06 to FY07. Yet
the Forest Service has cut funding to the Rogue River-Siskiyou by 64% for
facility maintenance, 20% for recreation operations and trail maintenance by
33%. Information on Forest Service recreation funding allocations by the WO and
Regions to the forests is limited, but what information is available indicates
that these budget cuts by the WO and Regions are consistent with other
areas.
Whether these cuts are being ordered by the Under-Secretary of
Agriculture (Mark Rey), the OMB or the Forest Service WO we may never know, but
the outcome appears apparent: the Forest Service Recreation program is being
shrunk to the point that it can be drowned in a bathtub.
The two
questions raised by this article are how widespread are these internal Forest
Service budget cuts and how many sites on how many forests have been closed or
decommissioned without public notification or knowledge?
For more
information on the Forest Service's RSFMP program and elimination your
recreation opportunities go to http://www.westernslopenofee.org/NoFee/rsfmp.php.