-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow It's going to cost you and arm and a leg
It's going to cost you and arm and a leg
Written by Scott Silver   
Friday, 09 March 2007

For several years now I've been writing about the increasing use and abuse of inmates as a source of cheap labor --- labor which can be used as a recreational resource on public lands for the purposes of outsourcing, privatization and increased fee generation.

The American Recreation Coalition in conjunction with the National Park Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers and InterActiveCorps have actively pursued this idea and have gone so far as to offer up the use of inmates as a tool in their jointly prepared "Toolbox for the Great Outdoors".

 Here's a short quote from that source:

[Description -Federal and state courts are a source for community service labor, including skilled labor, and penalties and fines can provide project funding.
Purpose -Identify persons and organizations with specific talents and capabilities and with a debt to society to augment the resources of federal recreation and resource agencies.
]

In today's free-market obsessed world, the chain-gang concept is old fashioned and in my numerous blog entries on this topic, I've done my best to share today's state-of-the-art thinking on what some now consider to be the appropriate use of an underutilized resource.
Search the Wild Wilderness blog for the term "inmates" and you'll see how valuable a resource prisoners are becoming -- especially as federal recreation budgets are slashed and as paid employees are let go.

Pasted below is an article which extends this thinking to it's next logical level, that being using prisoners as a source of body parts. After this, there is only one more level possible. Someday, someone will suggest killing prisoners and paying the prisoner's family a cash benefit in exchange for their lives. That's as far ad the free-market system can go.

Scott 

--- begin quoted ---

March 08, 2007
S.C. considers cutting prison time for inmates who donate organs
SEANNA ADCOX - Associated Press


COLUMBIA, S.C. - Inmates in South Carolina could soon find that a kidney is worth 180 days.

Lawmakers are considering legislation that would allow prisoners to donate organs or bone marrow in exchange for time off their sentences. A state Senate panel gave the nod to an inmate organ and tissue donation program Thursday; debate was postponed on whether the incentive could be added because legislators worried it may not be allowed under federal law.

"People are dying. I think it's imperative that we go all out and see what we can do," said the bills' chief sponsor, Sen. Ralph Anderson, D-Greenville. "I would like to see us get enough donors that people are no longer dying."

The measure approved by the Senate Corrections and Penology Subcommittee would set up a volunteer organ and tissue donor program in the state Corrections Department to teach inmates about the procedures and the need for donors. The incentive bill on which lawmakers want legal advice would shave up to 180 days off a prison sentence for a donation.

South Carolina advocates for organ donations said the incentive policy would be the only one of its kind in the nation.

Federal law makes it illegal to give organ donors "valuable consideration." Lawmakers want to know whether the term could apply to time off of prison sentences.

"We want to make this work, we really do," said Sen. John Hawkins, R-Spartanburg. "But I want to make sure no one goes to jail for good intentions."

Mary Jo Cagle, the chief medical officer of Bon Secours St. Francis Health System in Greenville, urged senators to find an allowable incentive. She said the two-bill package offers "the opportunity for a unique kind of social justice."

"We have a huge need for organs and bone marrow," Cagle said.

But Melissa Blevins, executive director of Donate Life South Carolina, said any incentive would break the law and the principle behind donations. "It really muddies the water about motive. We want to keep it a clearly altruistic act," she said.

Under the proposals, money for medical procedures and any prison guard overtime pay would be paid by the donor recipient and charitable groups. The state would also be able to decide which inmates are permitted to donate.

Corrections Department Director Jon Ozmint said he believe inmates would donate even without the incentive.

"There are long-term inmates who would give if they knew a child was dying," he said. "They're lifers. They know they're going to die in prison."

In South Carolina, 636 people are on a waiting list for organ donations. Last year, 291 people received organ transplants - 90 percent of them from dead donors. About 50 people awaiting transplants die each year, Blevins said.

Comments (3) >>

B.B, said:

  this caught my eye too. i was imagining Scooter Libby throwing in a kidney to reduce his sentence. ah, the insanity of it all!
March 09, 2007

Paul S, said:

  This has already been predicted Scott! Remember the cult classic with Charlton Heston in it?

Thorn: "It's people. Soylent Green is made out of people. They're making our food out of people. Next thing they'll be breeding us like cattle for food..."

Maybe they will give me a million dollars now if I promise to commit Sepukai and not live past 65. I'll forfeit my Soc. Security and the Government can sell my body parts for additional profit.

Hell Scott, we are in the wrong business, preaching the wrong politics..."all these old people are dying and nobody is making any money off the bodies!!!"
March 09, 2007

trv said:

  anyone who knows how difficult it is to find a donor would welcome prisoner donations. In the US prisoners are eligible and receive organ and marrow donations, paid for by taxpayers. Why not give them the chance to give back and give them equal opportunities to donate?
September 10, 2007
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v2.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.