-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow User Fees and the Prison Industrial Complex
User Fees and the Prison Industrial Complex
Written by Scott Silver   
Tuesday, 30 November 2004

Quoted from appended article:

"(the program) could be up and running in 60 days, though it would take a while to go through the court system and sentence 50 appropriate people."

What's proposed is the creation of a new prisoner monitoring system, the funding of which would be generated, in part, by user fees that presumably will be charged to the prisoners themselves.  But in order to get the program up and running, this Wisconsin country apparently(?) needs to arrest, try and convict 50 of the right sort of people. Perhaps there's a peace march being planned nearby from which suitable demonstrators can be culled.

Scott

PS... You'd think the new system will be outsourced. If so, I wonder who'll be awarded the contract  --  Dyncorp, Halliburton, Wackenhut or perhaps the concessionaire of Abu Ghraib?

"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (administrators) too plainly proves a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery." -Thomas Jefferson 

--- begin quoted ---

Winnebago County eyes inmate monitoring plan
Posted: Tuesday, Nov 30, 2004
By Jen Scherer - Daily News staff writer


ROCKFORD - If a new program is approved, Winnebago County may be able to keep some inmates out of the jail and save money at the same time.

After much research, Sheriff Richard Meyers said his department modeled an electronic monitoring program after the Cook County program.

The local judges signed off on the program, and it has been presented to the public safety commission, which is part of the county board, as well as a 24-member citizens committee. If the public safety commission approves the program, it will go to the finance committee and then to full board, Meyers said.

"(We're) giving the board the opportunity to review it," Meyers said. "They'll determine if they fund it and if they do, how they'll find the dollars to do it."

According to Meyers' research, the electronic monitoring program would actually cost less than housing the inmates in jail.

Based on 50 inmates using the program, the initial cost would be $739,000 per year. Of that, the county will recover $200,000 in user fees.

It costs between $50 and $62 per day, on average, to house each inmate in the jail. That would translate to at least $2,500 per day to house the same inmates, or $912,500 per year. Once the transportation costs and other fees are added in, it costs closer to $1.2 million to house 50 inmates for a year, he said.

"The key is finding those inmates that pose the least risk to the community," Meyers said.

Overcrowding in the jail is an ongoing problem which dates back to the mid-1990s. While the county is in the process of building a new jail, the facility will have only 1,200 beds, and as it stands, jail population is projected to keep growing and surpass that, Meyers said.

As a result, Meyers said he is working to implement programs that will keep the numbers down, while keeping the community safe. Electronic monitoring, he believes, would do just that.

"This is how we're going to keep down to the 1,200 level in the new facility," Meyers said.

The county had an electronic monitoring program about 15 years ago, but the program failed because of a lack of proper staffing, Meyers said.

"The key to making it safe for the community is providing appropriate staff," Meyers said. "Without that oversight, it's too risky to the public."

He is proposing eight new hires to run and oversee the program. One person would be responsible for determining appropriate candidates for electronic monitoring, others would install the technology in the inmate's home and attach the ankle device on the inmate, while one deputy per shift would be assigned to respond to alarms and do spot checks to ensure the inmates are where they're supposed to be.

Meyers said the technology is pretty advanced. The system could, for example, be set up so that inmates do breathalyzer tests by the phone.

People with certain types of previous convictions, or who are accused of certain crimes, would not be eligible for electronic monitoring. Eligibility would be determined on a case by case basis.

If the county does approve program funding, Meyers said it could be up and running in 60 days, though it would take a while to go through the court system and sentence 50 appropriate people.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v5.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.