-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow A bizarre new user-fee -- Jail Fees
A bizarre new user-fee -- Jail Fees
Written by Scott Silver   
Tuesday, 20 January 2004

Quoted from appended article ...

["Citizens like it," Lanteigne said. "The philosophy is to shift money away from the taxpayer and the general fund and increase user fees for everything from parks and recreation, planning, zoning and jails. I think as budget opportunities arise, more people are going to look at user fees."]

Guilty or INNOCENT, it's going to cost you if, for any reason, you should end up in the Fairfax slammer. And while these new go-to-jail fees may today be low ("a bargain", some will say), soon enough America's prison system will be fully privatized and who knows how high these incarceration fees will then go.

Before long, only the wealthy will be able to afford a night behind bars. Presumably the more you're willing to pay, the better treatment you'll receive. Some will go so far as to suggest that "citizens like it" as long as they think they're receiving fair value for their money. That is, after all, the forest-fee mantra -- so why should it not be the prison-fee mantra?

But what is to become of indigent prisoners, political prisoners and prisoners of conscience. What in the world will become of the fee-demo activist who as a matter of principle chooses not to pay forest recreation user-fees, refuses to pay the resulting fine for failing to pay those forest fees,  is thrown in jail for not paying his court fees and then fails to, or simply can not afford to, pay his prison fees???

How long before we return to the days when it was common to tip your executioner? Are we perhaps almost there today???

Scott

--- begin quoted ---

Fairfax Jail To Charge Its Inmates $1 a Day
Room-Board Payment Is Only One in Area
By Carol Morello - Washington Post Staff Writer
January 17, 2004


Inmates serving time in Fairfax County's jail will have to pay part of their debt to society in cold, hard cash.

Starting next week, prisoners in the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center will be assessed a token fee of $1 a day for room and board. Although the money represents a fraction of the $130 daily cost of housing an inmate, the sheriff's department expects the fees to contribute $200,000 to $300,000 a year to the county's budget, said Lt. Tyler Corey, a spokesman for the sheriff's office.

With its policy, authorized under a new state law, Fairfax will become the first jail in Northern Virginia and the only one in the Washington area to charge inmates for their keep. Some Maryland county jails have a sliding scale of fees for inmates on work-release programs but not for the general population. The District does not charge inmates for living expenses or the medical co-pays that are common in many jails, said Darryl J. Madden, spokesman for the D.C. Department of Corrections.

In Fairfax, all inmates will be asked to pay the $1 daily fee, regardless of whether they later are found not guilty. Computers will pluck the money automatically from individual canteen accounts normally used for sundries and snacks. Unpaid fees will not affect an inmate's release date, and indigent prisoners will not be penalized. But a tab will be maintained indefinitely so that anyone rearrested with money in hand will have the amount due confiscated.

"If you're arrested with $50 in your pocket and a $30 balance owed, we're going to take that $30," said Corey, who described some of the inmates as peeved over the policy.

Numerous states allow county-run jails to charge prisoners user fees. According to a 2002 survey by the American Corrections Association, 27 states charged prisoners for room and board, although most were limited to convicted criminals earning wages in work-release programs.

Relatively few of the more than 3,000 counties in the United States demand payment for a night behind bars, but the number is expected to grow as local governments are throttled by financial constraints.

"It's another creative avenue to deal with budget cuts," said Laura E. Noonan, president of corrections.com, a Web site dedicated to prison industry issues.

Some critics say user fees are unfair and counterproductive.

"More than half our prisoners have not been convicted of anything," said Arthur Wallenstein, director of the Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, where only work-release inmates are charged anywhere from $5 to $25 a day, depending on their ability to pay. "They're no different than the person who made bail living at home waiting to go to trial."

Asking inmates to pay for jail stays, he said, would be akin to "charging them for being poor."

"Many in jail already owe everyone in town," he said. "They owe child support -- that should always come first. They owe court costs on past cases. Many owe restitution to victims of crime. Plus they're paying rent for their family at home. I personally could not approve of a jail fee largely for public relations when they have enormous responsibilities already imposed by the legal system that are not being paid."

Supporters of inmate fees say they help teach a lesson to lawbreakers, while offsetting taxpayer costs.

"It puts some responsibility on the inmates and relieves the taxpayer," said John Jones, executive director of the Virginia Sheriffs' Association, which championed the 2003 bill authorizing the fees.

In the first six months after Virginia Beach began the $1-a-day charge on inmates in July, the county collected more than $120,000, said Sheriff Paul J. Lanteigne. In addition, anyone convicted of a traffic offense or misdemeanor in Virginia Beach is fined $5 for court security salaries and another $5 for officer training programs. People serving on weekends are charged $9 a day. Those given electronic home monitors are expected to pay the $12 a day cost to lease the equipment.

"Citizens like it," Lanteigne said. "The philosophy is to shift money away from the taxpayer and the general fund and increase user fees for everything from parks and recreation, planning, zoning and jails. I think as budget opportunities arise, more people are going to look at user fees."

William Sturgeon, an author who has visited dozens of jails while researching books on youthful offenders, said such fees can help introduce accountability into inmates' lives. But he laments the tendency of cash-strapped counties to put the money into the general fund instead of rehabilitative programs.

"If that money can go into a fund so the indigent inmate can get some decent clothing when he gets out of jail and goes for a job interview, I don't see anything wrong with it," he said. "But it's not a moneymaker."

Indeed, some counties have stopped assessing the fees because the administrative costs were higher than the money collected, said Ken Kerle, author of "American Jails: Looking to the Future."

In Fairfax, where inmates were advised of the policy by in-house televisions, the sheriff's department has the option of pursuing an inmate with resources for an unpaid bill. But it does not anticipate using collection agencies, Corey said.

"If there's a $10 balance left on the account, we're not going to go after someone," he said.
 

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v9.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.