-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow BLOG arrow Of Lassen and Yosemite
Of Lassen and Yosemite
Written by Guest: Bob Madgic   
Monday, 05 March 2007

Every summer evening in Yosemite National Park a large bonfire used to be built on Glacier Point. The embers were then pushed over the side in a spectacular firefall, a spectacle I witnessed many times. Yet, in one of the most naturally beautiful places on earth, something this artificial seemed out-of-place. And herein lays the central question: do our national parks exist to entertain and cater to human needs? Or to protect America's natural, cultural and historical treasures? The answer to both questions is decidedly yes, but with added clarity needed.

To better manage our national parks-the first was Yellowstone in 1872-congress created the National Park Service (NPS) in 1916. Its mission: to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of future generations. Given such clarity of purpose, what followed is quite amazing. In Yosemite, for example, which got designated in 1905 and had already seen magnificent Hetch Hetchy Valley dammed and inundated with water in 1913, Ahwahnee Lodge opened in 1927, with a golf course, tennis courts, and swimming pool. Badger Pass Ski Area opened in 1935, followed by gas stations, motels, gift shops, apartments, restaurants, houses, garages, all told more than 1,000 buildings and 30 miles of roads in a valley 7 miles long and one mile wide.

A mentality had long existed in America that public lands existed to be exploited. But the attendant poisoning of air, land and water caused Congress to pass vital environmental laws in the 1960s and 1970s. In concert the NPS recommitted itself to preservation of nature as its primary purpose. Yosemite reduced automobile traffic, removed roads and paved areas, eliminated the golf course, gas stations and other businesses, and ended the firefall, something better suited to Disneyland or Las Vegas.

In Lassen Volcanic National Park a ski area had been built near the south entrance, and cabins, gas station, store, and café near Manzanita Lake, where rental boats littered the shoreline. True to their mission, enlightened officials eliminated most of these intrusions. Today Manzanita Lake is as picturesque and spotless as could be. On most summer or fall days, canoes, kayaks, prams, and float tubes will dot the trout-laden lake, hikers and anglers on the trail encircling it, joined by eagles, ospreys, and myriad waterfowl species, deer always nearby. To paddle here, snow capped peaks reflected in the water, serenaded by honking geese, is idyllic. For those appreciative of nature's gifts, Lassen is indeed special.

Enter the Bush administration and its business-oriented ideology. Officials developed a national park plan that would have privatized many services, permitted more businesses and mechanized vehicles, built more roads, and lowered clean air standards. When this plan surfaced, nationwide protests erupted. Americans spoke loudly and clearly: keep our national parks as unspoiled as possible! The administration retreated and announced "new" policies reaffirming conservation as the top priority. But commercialization pressures persist, with concessionaires and motorized recreational enterprises the chief lobbyists, helped in part by a momentary decline in visitors. In truth our parks are more in danger of being loved to death than ignored, and despite occasional dips in visitor numbers, this trend will only accelerate with population growth. Do we really want 6 million people visiting Yosemite instead of 3.5 million? Or one million people visiting Lassen? What's the point?

Yes, the parks need tour buses, some lodging facilities, and I suppose those huge RVs with noisy generators and all of the conveniences of home. But the NPS must be primarily dedicated to its mission: to educate about nature's wonders, and how our ancestors lived; to protect unique formations, such as redwood forests, deserts, and swamps; to preserve sublime creations, such as Oregon's Crater Lake; and to sustain wild creatures in their natural setting, such as the grizzly bear, bison, and wolf. Our parks are finest when experienced, by camping, walking, hiking, rock climbing, snowshoeing, biking, x-country skiing, photographing, rafting, birding, angling, boating, rafting, riding, swimming, backpacking-all best done without leaving a trace. Yes, let's strive to make this group of users as large and diverse as possible.

For anyone to argue that our national parks need to return to a better past i.e. more commercial enterprises, misses the point entirely. Our parks are precious precisely because of their natural authenticity, already too compromised. They cannot be all things to all people, and we should not try to re-make them into something other than the magnificent sanctuaries they are. As a wise voice said, we have power to destroy such temples of nature, but never, never in our wildest imagination could we ever recreate them.



Bob Madgic is the author of "Shattered Air: A True Account of Catastrophe, Courage, and Rescue on Yosemite's Half Dome" and "A Guide To California's Freshwater Fishes." He lives in Anderson, Calif. For more info go to www.bobmadgic.com
Comments (1) >>

Georgia said:

  Grizzly, Bison and what? Wolves?????? In california????
July 09, 2007
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


Last Updated ( Monday, 05 March 2007 )
 
v14.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Syndicate