Just a thought -  I have heard from some people I respect very much that it is better to let corporations convert historic structures to business purposes, than to let them rot away.  That approach bothers me a bit.  If it is true, why does NPS operations have a role in it?  Why not exclude from park and let the historic preservation group deal with it like they do other private properties with historical values. 

What if???..... we found that maintaining the bison herd at Yellowstone National Park was costing too much, yet if we didn't do anything, the herd would die off.  So someone gets the bright idea that Buffalo Candy Products, Inc would be interested in accomplishing what the park can't afford.  All they want is credit for "saving the herd" (and a  little ear tag with the company logo).  They will also want a representative to be sitting at the table when biological decisions are being made for YELL.  What would we think about that?

Read on...

 Art Allen

--- begin quoted --- 

February 15, 2007  /   nationalparkstraveler.com
NPS Seeking Deep Pockets for Cuyahoga NP Inn

"Park Service Seeks New Developer."

That's the headline in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and it serves as another example of the National Park Service being forced to sell off America's heritage because it's too financially strapped to maintain all the structures on its 84-million-acre landscape.

OK, "sell" is probably too harsh of a word. But when the agency is leasing out structures for five and six decades, it might as well be selling them. And when it's allowing historic buildings to be transformed into restaurants, convention centers, and B&Bs, it's allowing history to be erased. Yet isn't that why some of these parks were established, to protect and preserve moments of history?

The Plain Dealer's story is set in Cuyahoga Valley National Park , a bucolic little setting near Cleveland. The problem is that a developer who signed a lease back in 1994 (under the Clinton administration, not the current administration. I point that out to demonstrate that this practice has been going on for some time and spans political parties) to transform two 19th century structures -- one a cavernous barn into a restaurant/banquet hall, and the other into bed-and-breakfast suites-- had to back out of his lease after failing to find financing for the project.

If you're keeping track, this brings to at least three the number of deals the NPS is swinging with developers to transform our nation's cultural sites and heritage into commercial ventures. The others that I know of are the Fort Hancock endeavor at Gateway National Recreation Area in the New York-New Jersey area and the Fort Baker  deal at Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

If you know of others, please pass them on.   

Comments (0) >>

Write comment

Show/Hide comment form

Name

Email

Title

Comment

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment