-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Land management arrow Bomar Predictions
Bomar Predictions
Written by Scott Silver   
Monday, 11 December 2006

A great many National Park advocates have high hopes for the new director Mary Bomar. After the horror that was Fran Mainella, it is understandable that people who love our parks desperately want to believe that the current director will be better than the last.

I expect that will be the case, but only because of how extraordinarily horrible was Mainella. Yet Mainella merely lived up to my expectations. For example, on the day Mainella's name was offered up as a candidate for the Director's position, I wrote:

 A few hours ago, President Bush announced the nomination of Fran Mainella to head the National Park Service. I would hope that the environmental community HOWLS like banshees at this nomination!!!!

Later that  week I went on to say:

Can there be any doubt that Ms. Mainella's job will be to  facilitate the Corporate Takeover of Nature and the Disneyfication of the Wild?

Mary Bomar will not be another Mainella though she won't be a great director either. My guts tell me Bomar will likely do a great deal of harm by successfully facilitating additional commercialization, privatization and perhaps even motorization of the park system. But because Bomar is so damned politically savvy and personable, that fact will likely go unnoticed until after the damage is done.

Because Bomar is so damned savvy, I predict that neither the press nor the big-green conservation organizations will adequately watchdog her and as a consequence of that failure, Bomar will successfully advance much the same agenda Mainella would have advanced had Mainella been competent.

Pasted below is Bomar's very first memo to her troops. It sounds so love-er-ly that Julie Andrews or even Mary Poppins herself might have sung it.

I've emboldened phrases and passages that jarred my tilt sensors. This phrases will become the issues for which, in retrospect, former Director Bomar will probably be best known.. or so I predict.

Scott

 

12/07/06
Memorandum
To:            All Employees
From:    /s/ Mary A. Bomar  Director
Subject:       National Park Service Centennial Challenge

In my first memo to you, I stressed the qualities of courtesy, communication and teamwork as essential ingredients for our success. I pledge that I will communicate with you on issues of importance to the National Park Service, using many communication tools, to help foster cooperation and teamwork among one another and our partners.

On August 24, 2006, the eve of the National Park Service’s 90th anniversary, President Bush challenged the Service and the American people to work together over the next ten years to strengthen the parks and to prepare them for another century of conservation, preservation and public enjoyment.

The President was clear in his directive that he expects us as an agency to work closely with our many partners to leverage government investment with philanthropic and partnership contributions and to establish clear, measurable performance goals that will ensure that all the investments made in the parks are contributing to the long-term protection of the priceless resources entrusted to our care.

Since August, we have called upon many of our colleagues in the field to help craft our message outlining the purpose and expectations of the President’s Centennial Challenge.  The three program initiatives we have developed consistent with the President’s directive are - Strengthening Core Park Operations, Connecting People to Parks, and Serving Communities through Signature Programs.   Just before Thanksgiving, we shared this message with representatives from a number of our partners in the philanthropic, conservation, corporate and friends communities. Their support was unanimous and enthusiastic.

Secretary Kempthorne is a staunch advocate of the National Park Service and the Challenge, leading the effort to work with our partners and strongly endorsing the funding necessary to make the Challenge a reality with the Office of Management and Budget.  While I cannot share with you the specific dollar amounts being considered while the President’s FY08 budget is still under debate, there is a clear understanding that a strong government investment is required in order to stimulate philanthropic contribution—and that much of the federal commitment needs to be directed to mission critical needs of field areas throughout the county.

Support by Superintendents and park staffs are critical to the success of the Centennial Challenge.  In the weeks and months ahead we will supply greater detail regarding the Challenge’s specific elements, particularly as the budget is made public. Undoubtedly you will receive many questions from your partners and the public, and I hope you will be as enthusiastic about this wonderful opportunity as I am. All our parks—as well as our visitors—will benefit from the Centennial Challenge.

In the meantime, we will continue to fine tune the Centennial Challenge message in order to make it the compelling story it needs to be in order to garner the public and political support it so richly deserves. I will also keep you up to date on the Centennial Challenge as new information becomes available.

Thank you for your continued support and for your efforts each and every day. 

Comments (1) >>

George Moffatt said:

  If we could trust the Bush Administration on conservation issues, and its lack of progress in conservation and environmental protections suggests we can't, I still would be concerned about what Bomar means by such "honey words" as "partnership contributions," "clear measurable performance goals," "Connecting People to Parks," and "Serving Communities through Signature Programs." And the fact that NPS "parners" support for the pending NPS plan was "unanimous and enthusiastic" compels us to know who these "partners" are, since I noticed she didn't mention any conservation and preservation groups, the traditional non-profit supporters of open space.

Will connecting people to parks mean introducing activities, such as rock concerts, that might draw crowds but harm the environment? Will serving communities with signature programs mean yielding to local interest groups to, for example, allow snowmobiles and ATVs in parks because local merchants want to rent them to park visitors? Or relaxing certain park regulations in response to local interests, such as hunters, etc. And does measurable goals mean that if a park doesn't increase traffic (whether harmful or not to the park), the park then will be regarded as not doing its job?

The national greens, in promoting their own agendas, as in their wont, aren't paying enough attention to the open spaces we've already won. This inattentiveness, in turn, makes it easier for bureaucrats do quietly rewrite NPS "measurements" to undermine NPS's original goals and allow commercial "partners" to slip into our parks, ostensibly to help correct some NPS ill.

smilies/grin.gifon't trust Bomar or anyone in Interior. They represent neither our parks or the taxpayers.

George Moffatt
Oceanport NJ
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
December 15, 2006
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v4.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.