-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Land management arrow Editorial - Fie on America the Beautiful Pass
Editorial - Fie on America the Beautiful Pass
Written by Scott Silver   
Wednesday, 18 February 2004

What follows is another great fee-demo editorial. Too bad that the newspaper in which this appeared today, the Idaho Mountain Express, is not one that will be read far and wide. Therefor it remains up to us to get this story told in all the places that are either unfamiliar with this issue or are not already reading editorials such as this...

Scott

--- begin quoted ---

February 18, 2004
Fie on forest fees


The Recreation Fee Demonstration Program, paying to hike in the woods on public lands, was a bad idea when it began. It is still a bad idea, one that needs to be scrapped.

Last week, The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee delivered a welcome blow to the fees when it voted an astonishing 23-0 to make them permanent only in national parks.

Idaho Sen. Larry Craig is on the committee and deserves credit for opposing the fees and recognizing that Congress had failed to devise a way to levy the fees fairly-or cost-effectively.

In the Sawtooth Forest, fee collection has been sporadic and created a kind of cat and mouse relationship between the Forest Service and the very people it serves.

The General Accounting Office recently estimated that public land agencies spent up to 50 percent of fee revenues just to collect the fees from users of the nation's outback. That's excessive.

"Fee demo" was the bad idea of Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, but is now supported by no less a champion of bad ideas than Interior Secretary Gale Norton. The two have another bad idea for fixing the collection problem.

Regula and Norton are pushing to make "fee demo" permanent and to force citizens to purchase an "America the Beautiful" pass in order to visit all public lands, including those managed by the Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service.

Norton recently bypassed Congress with an "administrative decision" to punish non-compliance on BLM lands with six months in jail and a $5000 fine. This outrage is slated to begin in April.

We can see the jail conversations now:

"Whatcha in for?"

"Hiking without a license."

"Hard time for hiking? For trail-mix munching? Man, talk about getting tough on crime. Did they confiscate your boots as evidence?"

It's true federal land agencies don't have enough money to properly administer and care for the land. Congress has starved agencies' budgets in order to stuff other agendas.

But there are better ideas for raising money than hit-or-miss fees.

For instance, the Forest Service and the BLM could save nearly $2 billion a year by cutting unnecessary road building and maintenance, below-cost timber sales and cutting grazing subsidies.

Fee demo earned $35 million last year. Cutting $2 billion in pork is a better program.

The committee vote was a slap at Norton and Regula's plans, and it was delivered none too soon.

If Regula and Norton push through their agenda, the Woody Guthrie song will have to be re-written in the past tense: "This land was your land, this land was my land."

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v17.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.