-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow BLOG arrow Dude Ranch Wild
Dude Ranch Wild
Written by Scott Silver   
Sunday, 26 November 2006

Quoted from appended news article from today's Oregonian:

[The Forest Service, meanwhile, has found itself pinched between the conflicting federal regulations that, on one hand, prohibit most buildings in Wilderness, while simultaneously mandating the protection and maintenance of historic structures. "We wanted them to fix it up and keep the airfield always open...."]

The article continues....

[The agency conceivably could have hired a concessionaire to run the ranch as the National Park Service does with many facilities. But that would have meant prohibitively expensive upgrades, a Forest Service spokeswoman said...]

At issue, is the management of designated, big W, Wilderness.

Difficult to believe .... isn't it?

Isn't it???

Scott

--- begin quoted ---

November 26, 2006
Future uncertain for wilderness ranch

Volunteers keep Red's Horse Ranch going, but the Forest Service admits the site's long-term needs aren't being met

RICHARD COCKLE - The Oregonian


LA GRANDE -- This time of year, frigid temperatures and blowing snow mean casual visits are about to end at the historic Red's Horse Ranch eight miles from the nearest road in northeastern Oregon's Eagle Cap Wilderness.

The trails will reopen in June, and the U.S. Forest Service will take stock of how the former dude ranch fared during another winter season.

But the agency can do only basic maintenance; with a budget of $4,000 a year, that's all it can afford. The approach hasn't changed much in the 12 years since the Forest Service acquired the spread.

Fans of the picturesque site -- shoehorned into a deep wilderness canyon beside the Minam River and accessible only by shoe leather, horseback and small airplane -- worry that the ranch will continue to fall into disrepair, and they want to preserve the rich history of the place.

"It won't be too long and the roofs are going to get too old; there is going to be water seeping in. That's a slow process, and it's starting," said Karl Majerle of Duvall, Wash., who likes the ranch so much that he visited eight times last summer. He makes the 21/2-hour trip in his Cessna and lands on the grass airstrip there that's still open for public use.

The Forest Service acknowledges that the 80-year-old ranch faces an uncertain future.

"There is currently no direction to manage it differently," said District Ranger Mary DeAguero of Enterprise.

The Forest Service took possession of the ranch in 1994 as part of a land exchange that traded 2,657 acres of Forest Service land and 5,632 acres of U.S. Bureau of Land Management property for 9,428 acres of private property. The exchange won advocates in northeastern Oregon when the Forest Service promised it would free up 40 million board feet of timber for a sawmill in Elgin and 5 million board feet for a mill in Joseph.

The agency conceivably could have hired a concessionaire to run the ranch as the National Park Service does with many facilities. But that would have meant prohibitively expensive upgrades, a Forest Service spokeswoman said when the agency acquired the ranch. And under federal regulations, the agency was forbidden to operate a motel or guest ranch within the boundaries of the Eagle Cap Wilderness.

After the land exchange, the Forest Service spent several years pondering management alternatives ranging from destroying the rustic buildings to restoring them.

The ranch is now managed by unpaid volunteer caretakers, overseen by the Forest Service, DeAguero said.

The volunteers, who greet the arrivals and show visitors around, live on site for a week at a time from early summer until mid-November. Other volunteers cut the grass on the airstrip, using their own horses and mules, along with a mechanical sickle mower that remains at the ranch.

The primary buildings are a rustic lodge, two log duplexes, five cabins and a barn shaded by tall ponderosa pines. But the ranch includes a villagelike assortment of 33 buildings if you count a fallen-down sawmill, a chicken house, two outhouses, a sauna, a barbecue and a 120-foot-long wooden truss bridge spanning the Minam River.

"It's incredible," said Skip Miller, a Forest Service archaeologist. "It is so isolated in that spectacular valley. You never escape the feeling of 'Wow, it's a cool setting.' "

After the Forest Service bought the ranch, it found out how popular it had been with segments of the public.

As many as 10,000 pilots, hikers and horseback riders -- many of them regular visitors -- petitioned to have the ranch put back in private hands. The effort was led by a group called Citizens to Save Red's Horse Ranch.

Its campaign ultimately failed, and visitors aren't permitted to stay overnight in the buildings. But many do camp in the forest nearby, and the ranch remains a popular destination. Sixty members of a Piper Supercub airplane club spent a weekend camping at Red's and the nearby Minam Lodge guest ranch in August, for example.

The Forest Service, meanwhile, has found itself pinched between the conflicting federal regulations that, on one hand, prohibit most buildings in wilderness, while simultaneously mandating the protection and maintenance of historic structures.

"We wanted them to fix it up and keep the airfield always open," said Robert M. "Mick" Courtney, an Enterprise businessman, pilot and one of the partners who sold the ranch to the Forest Service. "It's kind of a unique place, and it would be a shame if they ever lost some of those buildings."

The Forest Service is doing its best to maintain the ranch, said DeAguero, the district ranger. Contract workers last summer replaced a foundation log on a historic cabin beside the main lodge and the chinking between the same cabin's other logs. The work was financed from $9,200 donated by Wallowa County for maintenance of historic buildings.

"It is demonstrating it can stand on its own two feet" without Forest Service dollars, said Rob Gump, a spokesman for the agency in Enterprise. He's confident that the Forest Service won't order the buildings removed, he said.

But Merel Hawkins, another former owner, became convinced a bigger budget is needed to maintain the ranch after riding to it on horseback earlier this month.

"I don't think they are keeping ahead of the game on it," he said. "I think it's going downhill."

Most of the Forest Service's sparse maintenance budget must go for water-purity tests and propane for the volunteers' heating and cooking needs, DeAguero said.

"It is a small price to pay for volunteers who we don't pay at all," she said. "They find their own way in, and they do maintenance."

Comments (7) >>

Cheryl Beck said:

  My aunt and uncle managed Red's Horse Ranch in the early to Mid 70's. My Aunt was killed when her horse spooked while she and my Uncle were crossing the Minam River. The whole story is very "Peyton Place in the Wilderness." Her jawbone showed up some years later in the Grande Ronde at La Grande and was found by a couple of college students.
October 04, 2007

Toiresa Troyer said:

  The reality of this article is that the past owners Merle and Mick fail to mention that there was a great deal of interest and a cash offer to purchase Red's by private individuals who would have kept the Ranch operating and would have improved the cabins and maintained with the highest of integrity the historical value of the Ranch but they got greedy and sold to the highest bidder...guess who? The Forest Service. The forest service had no business what so ever purchasing the ranch because as it is obvious to everyone now they can't take care of it and they really don't put much into the budget other than what they get in "in Kind" gifts of hard work from volunteers. It's disgusting that taxpayers paid for something that we can not use and isn't available to the public, just the forest service personel. Are people that have ties to the ranch bitter yes most certainly, first to the owners who sold to the government then to the government for their out of bounds purchase.
October 23, 2008

Jeffery D. Sackmaster said:

  Back in the 60s my father took the family to Reds several times and I remember Red very well. He used to take us in on pack trips that were unbelievable. Red was all cowboy and mountain man he used to wear a black hat and tell us of the old days. we would stay the night at the ranch and have a ranch breakfast and then pack up the horses and he would lead us far into the Highlonesome. on our way in we would stop for lunch of bologne sandwiches that were thick cut. We fished the Minum river. one of the great men we ment there was Cheif Justice of the Supreme court William O Douglas.we churned butter on the porch of the ranch. Every year when we returned my sister of about 3 years old rode a horse named Nickademus. I know those trails and those mountains Reds must remain and be protected.
July 13, 2009

Don Petersen said:

  Boy, does this take me back. Our family of four, and later just my wife and I, spent a number of vacations at Red's in the 70's and 80's. Our daughter was only 5 when we first visited and I can still see her perched on top of Gladys, a wonderful gentle horse. I fly fished the Little Minum, trolled for lunkers in the lake above the lodge, and we took all-day horseback rides never covering the same trail twice. We've traveled the world over the years, but Red's remains our all time favorite vacation destination. What a tragady it is no longer available to the public.

I felt at the time Red's was sold to the Forest Service it was a mistake. Bureaucrats make poor decision makers, as they have no personal stake in the outcome of their decisions. If there were accountability, this mess would have been resolved long ago. The partners who sold this property to the Forest Service should have know better.

The Forest Service won't fund the upkeep of Red's and is allowing it to decline to a point of no return. Since they've rejected all the other choices, why not sell it back to private investors who will commit to funding its restoration and upkeep? But, don't expect to get the value of your investment back Forest Service decision makers...you've squandered that opportunity.
July 31, 2009

David Mark Williams said:

  As the contractor responsible for the restoration of Red's Horse Ranch Trail Bridge, I have "intimate" knowledge of the position of the Forest Service regarding the status of Red's Horse Ranch. During contract negotiations, I offered to supply renovation services on the structures at Red's Horse Ranch, at no charge to the Forest Service or the taxpayers, but my offer was "declined". As a constuction firm which had extensive experience in restoration of log structures and had received a national award from the USDA for historical restoration, I was "somewhat surprised".
The Wallowa-Whitman unit has a few personell who still maintain ethics and high standards, but it is a dismal situation. I suggest you contact your Congressman or Senator if you have a desire to allow your children to experience the wonder of Red's Horse Ranch and the Minam.
December 11, 2009

BETTY FOX said:

  I visited Reds several years back, we rode in from Rock Springs and it was a fantastic ride, when we got to the bottom there was a medow and a rustic cabin and the remains of what looked like a lodge, we crossed the river and headed for Reds Horse ranch and the Minum River Lodge, this is some of the most beautiful country on earth. We were lucky, they were haveing a buffalo feed and dance that night, I believe that was one of the last days of Reds. Seems that when the gov.(Forest Service) bought it , they didnt care about it at all, that it is just another way to keep people out of the mountains. I rode in a few years later and the sale had been made and it was closed to the public, how sad, some more of our freedom taken from us who love that place. Now when I go in to the Wallowas, I go to Minum Ranch and then just go visit Reds, and it sure is going down hill. The wonderful volunters can only do so much. I am in hopes that the Forest Service will come to its sences and let someone buy it for public use again , that would just be wonderful for all of us who enjoy the wallowa wilderness.
August 17, 2010

Debra Wilson said:

  As a youth, I visited Reds with my dad, and who's family loaned out horses to Red when he needed a few extras on hand. I then spent time working at Reds, it was the best job I ever had! The decisions that were made I am sure seemed like the best ones at the time, but hindsite is 20/20. I commmend the volunteers on their efforts. I miss the place, and wish that other youths could too benifit from working, or visiting such a wonderful, educational, historical, envionmental treasure.
August 22, 2010
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


Last Updated ( Sunday, 26 November 2006 )
 
v5.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Syndicate