-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow Land Privatization Sets Off Alarms
Land Privatization Sets Off Alarms
Written by Scott Silver   
Tuesday, 14 March 2000

Below is the text of yesterday's feature article from ENN.COM, titled: "Land Privatization Sets Off Alarms".

In that article, George W. Bush's public lands advisor Terry L. Anderson gets to eat a triple helping of crow!

When you read this, please remember that Anderson and his organization are amongst the chief proponents of the Recreation Fee Demo Program!

Scott


---begin quoted---

March 13, 2000
Land Privatization Sets Off Alarms
By Pat Murphy


All along the watchtowers in the environmental community, alerts went out last December when the Washington-based Cato Institute published a 25-page document with the chilling headline, "How and Why To Privatize Federal Lands."

Terry Anderson's privatization proposal is alarmingly simple: Give each American a deed to a proportionate share of the 600 million acres of land now managed by the federal government over the next 20 to 40 years, and let deed holders keep or dispose of their shares as they see fit.

Anderson, 53, is quick to concede the plan isn't politically viable and won't be considered anytime soon. "It got more attention than they (Cato Institute) dreamed," Anderson said. "The main reaction from the environmental community is that 'this bodes terrible for the future of conservation in the United States.' "

The proposal also raised flags when one group, the Southwest Biodiversity Center in Tucson, identified Anderson as "environmental adviser" to Texas Gov. George W. Bush.

Anderson said he and others met once with Gov. Bush and did not discuss his plan.

"I don't anticipate this will come up at all with Gov. Bush, and it's not something that will rise up in his platform, nor is it something a presidential candidate will run with," he said.

Scott Silver, director of Wild Wilderness, is quick to denounce Anderson's plan. "As soon as we turn the wilderness into a cash commodity, it will evaporate," he said.

Both the Cato Institute and Anderson, who directs the Political Economy Research Center in Bozeman, Montana, identify themselves as "market liberals." Anderson's nonprofit group, however, confines its work to environmental matters and policies involving "enviro-capitalism."

The only second thoughts Anderson has about the document is that he would have acknowledged the political improbability of his proposal, and then focused on "rethinking public land management policies," which Anderson says have been costly and inefficient.

Although his plan for privatizing public land is pure in libertarian theory, its implementation would be a practical nightmare, critics say.

According to Anderson, each American man, woman and child at some point in time would be issued a lottery number that would coincide with a plot of federal land.

Numbers would be drawn, and deeds to slightly more than two acres each would be awarded to those holding corresponding numbers, he explained.

The land might be anywhere. A resident of New York might receive a deed for public land in Arizona. An urban homeless person might receive a deed for a rural plot in North Dakota.

What deed holders would do with their newly found property would be their choice: homestead, sell, trade, donate or organize adjacent deed holders into a community.

Deeds could even be sold to land developers, mining firms, timber corporations, ranchers, agri-syndicates and other businesses that might scout deed lists for names of owners of parcels in one area.

Anderson admits some covenants might be necessary to restrict uses. But he believes corporations share the values of environmentalists in matters such as stewardship of land.

Anderson also said:

"There's nothing to guarantee that private owners will always get it correct, but at least owners have a long-term stake in the sustainable value of the (land)."

"If all lands could be privatized, there would be no need for agencies."

"I don't expect Congress (to champion my idea) because there are too many interest groups that benefit from the status quo."

Books published by Anderson's PERC include "Free Market Environmentalism," "Wildlife in the Marketplace," "Enviro-Capitalists, Doing Good While Doing Well," "Water Marketing: The Next Generation." 

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v3.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.