-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Various arrow Things look like hell for the little guy
Things look like hell for the little guy
Written by Scott Silver   
Friday, 11 February 2005


Quoted from appended commentary, published in today's Toledo Blade.

Lots of little user fees and sales taxes don't break the bank of the governor's core constituency - which is why he can promote them with impunity. They will hurt the have-nots at the bottom of the socio-economic totem pole who scrimp to survive.

That is a reality some try to deny. Federal lands managers, for example, refuse to accept that recreation user fees are discriminatory and exclusionary, or that such fees impact low-incomes persons far more than they impact the wealthy. Ohio's State Park managers are likely to deny this reality as, of course, was Rep. Ralph Regula (R-OH) who forced his Recreation Access Tax upon an unwilling America.

Perhaps now that the user-fee issue has blown up in size and encompasses so much more than the original fee-demo battle, the American public will show some understanding and compassion as did the author of the appended commentary.

Then again, it's possibly that as President Bush promotes his "ownership society" message, middle-income persons will stampede over one another desperately trying to get beyond the masses of fellow 'non-owners' and break into the ranks of the "haves."

What fools and dreamers such people are if they think that by beating back their fellow travelers they can somehow hope to enjoy the fruits of Bush's ownership society.

Then again ... what fools are those who think that their incomes, however high they may be, quality them to as "haves" in Mr. Bush's neo-Feudalist Society.

Scott

--- begin forwarded ---
February 11, 2005

Things aren't looking too good for the little guy



IT'S a tough time to be poor. Not that being poor is a breeze any time, but now the government is poised to add insult to injury. A seismic shift is in the works among those who hold the power. It will eventually tip the scale of fair play completely to one side. The big breaks will go to the big constituents. The leftovers will go to those without political muscle, without a voice.

The old adage says you get what you pay for. Well, you get what you vote for in government. The compassionate conservative-in-chief re-elected last November is about to embark on one of the most immoral crusades in modern history - if you don't count the Iraq war. He's about to turn back the clock on more than half a century of political philosophy that preached "one for all," and replace it with "every man for himself."

In the gilded Bush Age, to have lots of money - inherited or gained through obscene corporate profits - is to make more money through government largesse. The prevailing political philosophy says the wealthy and greedy need protection from government interference - ergo its regulatory policies - and generous tax breaks for the greater good of the country.

Doesn't matter that we're still waiting for the trickle-down theory from the 1980s to make a practical appearance. The Republican wave rolling in from Washington to the red states says it's a terrific time to make a killing in America, to get a free pass on millions sheltered in wealthy estates, or made outright on the back of the cheapest labor outsourcing can buy. The GOP goal, according to the Gospel of Karl Rove, is to destroy any vestiges of FDR's influence on social obligations.

And the word was made true. In budget proposals submitted on the federal and state level are significant tax cuts for businesses and wealthy individuals, tax increases of the most regressive kind, and funding reductions or eliminations in programs that directly benefit the poor. Let's watch as the scale holding proposed funding to Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides medical coverage for the poor, tilts wildly out of balance as aid is sharply reduced on the federal level.

States, rather than being saddled with even higher Medicaid costs, respond in kind to Washington's harshness to the neediest. Ohio Gov. Bob Taft, bless his disappointing depth, recommends ending Medicaid vision and dental coverage as well as disability medical coverage. Yet he's all for relaxing various tax burdens on businesses and championing across-the-board cuts in personal income tax rates to make political points with the affluent.

Mr. Taft will make up for revenue lost in tax collections with lots of little user fees (read tax hikes) on perennial favorites like cigarettes and alcohol to electricity and new parking fees at state parks - which used to be the one taxpayer-funded commodity open to all Ohioans.

The temporary, 1-cent increase in the universally recognized regressive state sales tax, was supposed to expire later this year. Mr. Taft, reneging on that pledge, aims to retain half of last year's increase, taking the state sales tax to 5.5 percent.

Lots of little user fees and sales taxes don't break the bank of the governor's core constituency - which is why he can promote them with impunity. They will hurt the have-nots at the bottom of the socio-economic totem pole who scrimp to survive. Unfortunately, their scarce earnings will evaporate even faster under Mr. Taft's plan to make up the difference in tax cuts for the rich and powerful.

It will happen because the poor have no clout, no pricey lobbyists seeking favorable treatment on their behalf. They're an easy target for politicians with friends in high income brackets. And because the wealthiest in the country send their progeny to exclusive private schools, the plight of students struggling to achieve in public schools is easy to ignore.

Which is why President Bush can get away with targeting the Education Department for one third of the 150 federal programs earmarked for elimination or substantial reduction.

Gone is all federal money for vocational education that gives kids an alternative to college and a chance to learn a high-paying trade.

Gone, too, are adequate state subsidies to make college more affordable in Ohio while tuition caps to further hamstring state institutions are proposed.

Exactly what hope to succeed do the middle and under-class have while taking hits on everything from block grant funds to better education?

Exactly none.

It's a tough time to get a leg up when possession, position, and prosperity won't allow it.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v20.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.