-or GOOGLE our full site -
Heads Up!
Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations
BLOG CONTENT
OLDER CONTENT
|
HOME - Privatization Corporate Sponsors Rent Washington Mall
|
Corporate Sponsors Rent Washington Mall |
|
Written by Scott Silver
|
|
Thursday, 04 September 2003 |
|
Quoted from appended article:
The National Park Service, which oversees the Mall, had to approve the exhibition. The $10 million anted up by those corporate sponsors evidently made the decision easier for federal officials.
The Corporate Takeover of America's Crown Jewels marches forward with this unusually ugly display of prostitution by the National Park Service. Have a read of the following and then imagine where this is headed....
Scott
--- begin quoted ---
National Mall follies
Corporate sponsors spend millions to broadcast TV special
from federal property. - Date published: 9/4/2003
'Kickoff Live' is commercialism at its worst
DON'T BUY Pepsi Vanilla. That might be a simple way for Americans to
express their distaste for tonight's commercial desecration of the
National Mall, courtesy of the National Football League and a handful
of corporate sponsors.
"Kickoff Live 2003" is designed, organizers say, to start the NFL
season, which begins tonight with a game between the Washington
Redskins and the New York Jets, with a bang. But we know better. It is
not football that matters here. This gaudy affair is to football as
prostitution is to women. It is there to make money for someone else.
ABC, which is televising the live special from the Mall, is obviously a
willing partner in the glitzy lead-in to its inaugural football season
broadcast. In addition to Pepsi, sponsors include Coors beer, Reebok,
America Online, Verizon, the New York Stock Exchange, and perhaps the
most topical sponsor of all, the new movie "Fighting Temptations."
The National Park Service, which oversees the Mall, had to approve the
exhibition. The $10 million anted up by those corporate sponsors
evidently made the decision easier for federal officials. That's a
shame, because this deal sets a precedent for the abuse of grounds that
are at America's heart. Is this really a precedent we want to set? How
about we just go ahead and slap a Capital One logo on the U.S. Capitol
and and one from General Motors--or maybe Toyota--on the Washington
Monument?
Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised by such a nauseating commercial
display. Companies have to be "out there" to keep up with one another.
The corporate mentality is no longer satisfied to foster public
relations with its clientele, but rather to shove its message down the
collective, conspicuous consumer throat. Offering this up with the
gyrations of babe superstars like Britney Spears makes it all easier to
swallow for the predominantly male football viewership.
The question is whether Americans will ever get their fill, and send their own clear message in return.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of
criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use'
of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes. |
|
|
|