-or GOOGLE our full site -

GOOGLE the www
GOOGLE this website

Heads Up!

Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations

BLOG CONTENT

OLDER CONTENT

Administrative Login






Lost Password?
HOME arrow - Privatization arrow Corporate Presence in the Park
Corporate Presence in the Park
Written by Scott Silver   
Tuesday, 06 December 2005

Years ago, I tagged the Bryant Park privatization issue as one of special importance and I have reported upon it frequently. I'm doing so again because what's happening today in that little park in the heart of New York City provides such a clear example of how the privatization of virtually all of our public parks and open spaces is now happening. It provides the best example I can think of for what could, soon enough, be happening at the Capital Mall in Washington DC.

There have been NO SURPRISES with the privatization of Bryant Park. The privatization of this park has been occurring EXACTLY as expected. So if you like how the privatization of Byrant Park is progressing (which some will!) and would like to see this applied to the parks, forests, rivers, mountains and/or wilderness areas that you use and enjoy, then be patient. Do nothing and this form of privatization will reach you soon enough.

If you don't like what you see, then please take note and take appropriate action. This form of privatization is most definitely headed your way.

Scott

-- begin quoted ---

December 5, 2005
In Manhattan Park's Rebirth, Unease at Corporate Presence
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS


During the late 1980's, when Bryant Park in Midtown Manhattan was frequented by more drug dealers than sunbathers, the city turned the park's management over to a private group to try to revitalize a public space that many thought of as a lost cause.

That group, the nonprofit Bryant Park Restoration Corporation, helped transform the park into one of the city's most heavily used and beloved public spaces. But a major concern has come with the transformation: that Bryant Park is being operated in such a businesslike fashion - including charging fees for holding events, and allowing corporate sponsorships - that it barely seems like a public space anymore.

"It's come to the point where it impinges on the park to be used in a public sense," said Vikki Barbero, a neighborhood resident who is vice chairwoman of Community Board 5, a neighborhood advisory board.

No one can deny that the park is more beautiful and accessible than it was 20 years ago, and many of the events that take place in it are open to the public - if seats are available. Nevertheless, even though Bryant Park receives no public financing, the heavy rotation of private events has raised questions about how a park in the middle of the city can best serve the people. There are suggestions that Bryant Park has reached the saturation point and indications that the number of events in it may be reduced.

Similar complaints have been lodged in recent years at other parks, including Union Square and Madison Square Parks. Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried, Democrat of Manhattan, expressed concern at what he called a trend toward commercialization in parks.

"Parks have never in this city's history been thought of as entities that would fund themselves, and I think that's a dangerous concept," Mr. Gottfried said. "This takes us way down the road of a public park becoming a theme park."

No park managers have embraced commercialism with the enthusiasm of the Bryant Park Restoration Corporation, which runs the only public park in the city that receives no public money.

In the past few months, Bryant Park has played host to Fashion Week, sponsored by Olympus; summer movies underwritten by HBO; a concert series put on by ABC; and a book fair supported by The New York Times. Much of the eight-acre park is currently occupied by a privately operated holiday market and by an ice-skating rink sponsored by Citi. Each sponsor generally pays a rental fee and is allowed to post its corporate name as part of the event.

There are so many requests for private events that the corporation employs a small staff to sort through applications seeking permits for corporate parties, family celebrations and promotional events for new products, including Microsoft Windows Media Edition and Coffee-Mate, which had representatives dressed in cow suits passing out samples last spring. The fees vary, depending on factors including whether the event is open to the public.

Also, parts of the park - which is at Avenue of the Americas and 42nd Street, behind the New York Public Library - are closed at times to accommodate film and video crews. Commercial photographers are assessed hourly fees, determined in part by the "publicity potential for Bryant Park," the park's Web site says. Even the park's carousel can be rented for birthday parties or corporate events.

Daniel A. Biederman, executive director of the Bryant Park Restoration Corporation, said the events were necessary to produce revenue for park operations and to keep the park in use year-round. As part of its 1985 operating agreement with the city, the corporation is given wide latitude in financing park operations through commercial events.

"Most of the events in the park are free and open to everyone," Mr. Biederman said. "The concerts and movies often have a name attached, but so what? The public gets to go for free."

Mr. Biederman, a graduate of Harvard Business School who is also president of both the Bryant Park Management Corporation and the 34th Street Partnership, said that on most days the park has only a few conspicuous sponsorships, including a half-dozen signs saying that the free wireless access in the park is sponsored by Google.

"We understand there are people who come to the park as an escape, who are sensitive to commercial intrusions, and we try to be sensitive to that," Mr. Biederman said, adding that there had been few complaints.

Mr. Biederman said most of the events and attractions brought many more people to the park than would otherwise use it - including the rink, which is free, though the private firm that operates it charges $7.50 to rent skates and $5 to rent a locker.

User fees collected by the corporation have gone from zero in 1993 to $1.7 million in 2004. Under the 1985 agreement, the city paid a relatively small amount for the park's upkeep for several years but now pays nothing. The shift to a reliance on user and restaurant fees has coincided with the doubling of Bryant Park's revenue since 1993, to $4.2 million in 2004 - even as assessments on local businesses for the upkeep of the park have been reduced.

In response for what it sees as too many commercial events, Community Board 5 recently rejected an application for a liquor license by restaurant overlooking the ice rink.

And in a letter sent to the parks department last week, the board was critical of the multiplicity of commercial events held at Bryant Park and at Madison Square Park and said neighbors of those parks had been excluded from the decision-making process. "The conservancies that run Madison Square Park and Bryant Park need to be reminded that these are public parklands, not private revenue-generating venues," wrote David Diamond, chairman of the board.

William T. Castro, the borough commissioner of parks, said the city's Department of Parks and Recreation supported Bryant Park's management, but he added that the number of events at the park was likely to be reduced.

"I'm pretty confident that will be addressed," he said. "They run a very good park, but they can always do better."

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


 
v4.jpgtest

Fair Use Notice:    This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.