-or GOOGLE our full site -
Heads Up!
Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations
BLOG CONTENT
OLDER CONTENT
|
HOME - Land management Questioning the President's National Parks Agenda
|
Questioning the President's National Parks Agenda |
|
Written by Scott Silver
|
|
Saturday, 09 September 2006 |
Several big green organizations have been quick to give green-cover to
President Bush's selection of Dirk Kempthorne as Secretary of Interior and for
Bush's announced plans for a new National Park Service Agenda.
Why would anyone accept on faith that President Bush's agenda for the
National Parks will be good for the parks??? I do not doubt the need for
adequate park funding, but if the President's vision for the National Park is
not a vision that deserves support, then it should not be supported. It should
be opposed --- opposed openly and vigorously. Funding a bad vision will cause
harm --- something NPS Director Newton Drury knew so very well.
Pasted
below is a vision for the national parks. It is Agenda Item Number 11 of the
original Wise-Use Movement. It is an important statement and is one of the few
Wise-Use Agenda Items that have not yet been achieved since they were proposed
in 1988. This is NOT a vision deserving of additional funding. Who amongst us
can say to me that this is NOT the vision toward which President Bush and Dirk
Kempthorne are now working!?
I ask people who are concerned with National
Park issue to put please into the front of their brains the words "People
Moving." PEOPLE MOVING is where the action will be as the NPS moves towards
it's centennial anniversary. When, in the future, you hear reference to PEOPLE
MOVING please remember the words you're about to read.
Scott
"We have no money, we can do no
harm"
- Newton Drury
(Head of the National Park Service in the 40s)
-- begin quoted
--
Appendix C
The Wise Use Agenda
A Task Force Report Sponsored by
the Wise Use Movement
By Alan M. Gottlieb
Section I: The Top
twenty-Five Goals
<snip>
11. National Parks Reform Act, to
create protective agencies for our natural heritage of a size conducive to
responsible management and accessible to congressional oversight. Creates within
the Department of the Interior, under authority of the Assistant Secretary for
Fish and Wildlife and Parks four separate agencies each with its own director
responsible for management of our current over-sized and jumbled national park
system. Reorganizes the National Park Service, with new management
responsibility limited to only those Units officially designated "national
parks" and "national monuments" in the "natural" category; creates the National
Urban Park Service with management responsibility for all units of the park
system in urban settings designed primarily for contemplation, enlightenment or
inspiration, such as the National Capitol Parks; creates the National
Recreational Park Service with management responsibility for all National
Recreation Areas of the park system and other units primarily used for
recreational purposes; creates the National Historical Park Service with
management responsibility for all national historic parks and similar units of
primarily historic interest.
The present National Park Service with its
domain in excess of 80 million acres has grown into a bureaucracy so huge and
powerful that it can ignore the public will, the in- tent of Congress and direct
orders of the Secretary of the Interior with impunity. Such concentrated power
cannot be allowed to persist within a representative form of government. This
Act will separate out from the present conglomeration of diverse units four
different kinds of national heritage lands that have previously been lumped
together into a single vast and unresponsive agency. The new arrangements will
group together those that are naturally similar for appropriate management to
protect the essential character of each different kind of park.
MISSION
2010: Adequate Park Visitor Accommodations. A major thrust should be made to
properly accommodate the increased visitor load on our parks through a 20-year
construction program of new concessions including overnight accommodations,
classic rustic lodges, campgrounds and visitor service stores in all 48 national
parks, with priority given to Great Smoky Mountain, Everglades, Rocky Mountain,
Big Bend, Canyonlands, Sequoia, Redwoods, North Cascades, Denali, and Theodore
Roosevelt. Concession restoration should begin immediately in Yellowstone (West
Thumb). The lodge at Manzanita Lake in Lassen Volcanic National Park, which was
demolished by the National Park Service, shall be rebuilt in replica on its
original site and become the first project of Mission 2010, to become known as
the Don Hummel Memorial Lodge honoring the late outstanding leader of the
national park concession movement. The Concession Policy Act of 1965 should be
extended to all facilities of the proposed four park
services.
Appropriate overnight visitor facilities should be constructed
in all national monuments, national recreation areas, and major historical
areas. Policies that exclude people shall be outlawed. The possessory interest
of the private concessioner firms now serving the visiting public should be
maximized. Private firms with expertise in people-moving such as Walt Disney
should be selected as new transportation concessioners to accommodate and
enhance the national park experience for all visitors without degrading the
environment.
All actions designed to exclude park visitors such as
shutting down overnight accommodations and rationing entry should be stopped as
inimical to the mandate of Congress for "public use and enjoyment" in the
National Park Act of 1916.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of
criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use'
of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes. |
|
|
|