-or GOOGLE our full site -
Heads Up!
Wild Wilderness believes that America's public recreation lands are a national treasure that must be financially supported by the American people and held in public ownership as a legacy for future generations
BLOG CONTENT
OLDER CONTENT
|
HOME Additional Supporting Materials
Additional Supporting Materials
(Additional Supporting Materials)
In Wildness is
the Preservation of the World
Henry Thoreau
The success of the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program
(Fee-Demo) is critical to the recreation-industry lead
efforts to commercialize, privatize and motorize America's public
lands.
Before Fee-Demo, the recreation industry had
extremely limited ability to directly profit from the
development of our public lands. In their attempt to
generate larger profits and to exert their domination upon
America's wild lands, these corporate entities have literally
forced Fee-Demo upon the citizens of this nation. Simply stated,
the tradition of free public access to public lands stood in the
way of business.
On January 2, 1999, the Biodiversity Legal Foundation of
Boulder, Colorado wrote:
| | "We are confronted with what
may be one of the severest challenges ever to face environmental
preservation - the current big money/industrial drive toward
developing mass outdoor recreation..." | |
This threat, what many are calling "Industrial Strength
Wreckreation" or "Industrial Tourism" (a name coined by Edward Abbey) is
dependent upon the success of the Recreation Fee Demonstration
Program. Without Fee-Demo, there are extremely limited financial incentives
associated with the management of recreation activities upon public
lands.
If, however, permanent fee collection authority is approved by
Congress, as is now being sought by the American Recreation
Coalition and their member corporations, then "Wreckreation" on
public lands will come to be managed in accordance with
free-market doctrine. Environmental consideration will become
secondary to revenue generation. And, when public lands are
managed to ensure satisfactory financial returns, we will have
turned recreation into just another extractive industry, no
different than mining, logging, or grazing.
Wild Wilderness has dubbed this situation "The Corporate
Takeover of Nature," and it is for this reason that we strongly urge you to
oppose Fee-Demo.
When you are next asked to purchase a recreational "product"
made possible by the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program, please
reflect upon the warnings of Thoreau and Abbey and join us in boycotting the Fee-Demo program.
(Source for following quotes:
"Forest Service: Barriers to Generating
Revenue or Reducing Costs,"
United States General Accounting
Office GAO/RCED-98-58 pg.14-15.)
- COMPARE BEFORE FEE-DEMO
"The Forest Service is prohibited by law from obtaining a
fair return for certain goods or recovering costs for certain
services.
According to the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1964
(P.L. 88-578), the Forest service can charge fees only
for the use of (1) boat launching facilities that offer
services such as mechanical or hydraulic boat lifts and (2)
campgrounds that offer certain amenities such as toilet
facilities, drinking water, refuse containers and tent or trailer
spaces."
- WITH FEE-DEMO
"
The Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996
(P.L. 104-134), as extended by the Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (P.L. 104-208), directs the
Forest Service and three other federal land management agencies to
test the collection, retention, and reinvestment of new
entrance and user fees for recreation at a variety of sites."
- AND NOW WITH THE RAT (Recreation Access Tax)
"
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004
was passed as a last-minute rider attached to the Omnibus
Appropriations Bill. Commonly known as the "Recreation Access Tax" or
"THE RAT", this legislation authorizes the US Forest Service, National
Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service
and the Bureau of Reclamation to charge of a wide range of "standard",
"expanded" and "special" recreation fees.
|
Supporting
Documents |
- A Strategy for Recreation [EXTREMELY IMPORTANT]
(Read a shockingly honest explanation of how the USFS intends to
commercialize and privatize the lands we, the American people, have entrusted to it.)
Agreement Between ARC and the U.S. Forest Service
(This is the actual Challenge Cost-Share Partnership agreement
for the Demonstration Recreation Fee Program. ARC paid for the program so ARC gets to control the message.)
USFS pays private consultant $250,000 to make Fee-Demo work
Read about the Forest Service "Marketing Resources Group." They
believe they have a great product to sell ... if only the public would pay for it.
- USFS: "National Recreation Strategy"
(In 1988 ARC led President Ronald Reagan's Commission on
Americans Outdoors to conclude that our public lands should be
commercialized, privatized, and motorized.)
- President Reagan's uses fees to cut park funding
(When Ronald Reagan and James Watt introduced their National Parks
fee legislation the stated purpose was to free the parks from
appropriated funding and force the NPS to be self-funded.)
- Army Corps Engineers: Recreation Partnership Initiative [Very Explicit]
(The Corps describes a "win-win-win" scenario in which privately
financed recreation infrastructure is build on public lands.")
- Forest Service "Brands" of Recreation
(View the new product logos of the US Forest Service. This page is
directly related to the page listed immediately below. Both are very important.)
- Forest Service: Marketing the Great Outdoors [MUST READ]
(Forest Service top executive asks - "Have we fully
explored our gold mine of recreation opportunities in this country and
managed it as if it were consumer product brands?")
- ARC's Answer to Public Lands Funding
(This is legislation ARC is shopping around the House of
Representatives. So far, no one in Congress is willing to sponsor
this bill. Look out, this will be introduced in the 106th
Congress.)
- An Outdoor Recreation Policy
(This official Policy Document is what now guides Congress in its effort of Commercialize and Privatize
America's public lands. Painful to read, but truly enlightening!)
- Outdoor Recreation: A Reader for Congress
(Chairman Frank Murkowski introduces this "reader" by
reminding committee members that recreation is not only about
"fun and games." It's about money and partnerships with the private sector!)
- ARC Director Christine Jourdain tells Congress how fee-demo should be run
(Congressional testimony from May 6, 2004 explains precisely how
the recreation industry wants to take control of the fee-demonstration
program.) [MUST READ]
- KOA President Tells Congress how Public Lands Should be Run
(Hear the true story straight from ARC's spokesman. This testimony should
make your hair stand on end. KOA's are coming to a forest near you, and Fee-Demo is nothing but the nose of the camel.)
- Good Sam Club Director Tells Congress - RVers are Prepared to Pay-to-Play
(ARC Board Member, Susan Bray, let's Congress know their
members support fee-demo so long as it provides campgrounds
optimized for RVers, paved roads into Wild lands and plenty of
roadside attractions.)
- The BlueRibbon Coalition Addresses Congress on Fee-Demo
(The motorized recreation community has only one complaint
about fee-demo. They are worried that some of the money is not
being spent to provide new motorized trails, snow groomers, and
ACCESS!)
- Private/Public Ventures
(Read about a disastrous new USFS program designed to attract
private investment to finance commercial, privately owned facilities upon public lands. After the camel's nose, comes this!)
- Recreation Super-Bill (Murkowski)
(Senator Murkowski's statement on his proposed omnibus
legislation, with notes provided by Wild Wilderness. This is ARC-
sponsored legislation, written for recreation industry special
interests such as KOA, Disney, REI and others.)
- Recreation Super-Bill (Crandall)
(Derrick Crandall, ARC President, explains the legislation
his team has co-authored with Senator Murkowski.)
- American Recreation Coalition Membership
(Learn who ARC represents. It's certainly not you. Link to ARC's web page.)
- They Paid-To-Play - Now So Must You!
(Follow the money. Find out which politicians receive campaign
contributions for ARC member corporations.)
- Memorandum of Understanding: The Walt Disney Company
(An agreement between Disney and the U.S. Government to conduct joint
research and educational projects involving natural resource management
issues. Read it and try not to cry.)
| The Walt Disney Company is such an
important player in the future of America's Public Lands. They are a sustaining member of the American
Recreation Coalition, they are a member of the Recreation Roundtable and they are SO MUCH MORE! |
- Recreation Roundtable Membership
(List of Recreation Roundtable Members and their corporate
affiliations. These are the players calling the shots in
Washington.)
- The Partners Outdoors Program [ Major Gateway]
(An annual conference held at DisneyWorld sponsored by ARC's
Recreation Roundtable and seven federal agencies. Learn how the
private recreation industry and public employees are conspiring to
create recreation policy for America's public lands.)
- Political Contributions by ARC and the Recreation Roundtable
(Follow the money. See whose pockets Derrick Crandall lines.)
- Recreation Exchange Membership
(List of corporations who support ARC's Recreation Exchange.
The exchange is a monthly get-together of recreation industry
executives and federal policy decision makers.)
- ARC's 1994 Tax Return
(How can ARC possibly qualify as a 501(c)3 Tax Exempt Corporation?)
- ARC's 1998 Board of Directors
(Discover who's on ARC's Board of Directors. We've provided their
names, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses. They'd love to
hear from you!)
- ARC Congressional Testimony 1998
(ARC's Feb. 26, 1998 Congressional statement in support of its
Fee-Demo program. Listen to the man who brought you Fee-Demo.)
- More ARC Congressional Testimony 1998
(ARC's May 7, 1998 Congressional statement in support of
pay-to-play, commercial, recreation. Derrick Crandall tells congress
how National Forests and Parks should be run.)
- ARC Senate Testimony 1999
(ARC's Feb. 4, 1999 Senate Hearing statement in support of
Fee-Demo. Crandall, once again, instructs Congress on Fee-Demo and
outdoor recreation.)
- U.S. Forest Service Partnership Guide
(This document was recently removed from the web by the USFS.
We suspect they didn't want you to read it!)
- National Forest Foundation
(The NFF "is the official nonprofit partner of the U.S. Forest Service"...
created by Congress, no less! What a boondoggle.)
- GAO Report: Forest Service - Barriers to Generating Revenue or Reducing Costs
("This report (1) identifies the lessons that can be learned from
efforts by nonfederal land managers to generate revenue or become financially
self-sufficient from the sale or use of natural resources on their lands and
(2) discusses legal and other barriers that may prevent the Forest Service
from implementing similar efforts on its lands.")
- GAO Report: Fees
for Recreation Special-Use Permits Do Not Reflect Fair Market Value
("Overall, our past work has shown
that frequently the Forest Service charges considerably less than
fair market prices for the use of the land for these major commercial
activities and that as a result federal fee revenues are millions of
dollars less than they could be.")
- Forest Service explains why Fee-Demo is important to Industrial Tourism
("Many areas are now charging fees and having those fees
returned to the site where collected thanks to this innovative
congressional program. Marketing plans and business plans are now
becoming part of the Forest Service lingo. Outfitter and Guide
service operations and other private concessions are now being
seen more as partners...")
- Still More ARC Links
(More Dirt on the American Recreation Coalition and its president, Derrick A. Crandall.) |
|
A Bad Program That Must be Stopped!
The following references pertain to a proposal currently being evaluated
by Congress and the Department of the Interior. If enacted, this
program would remove 2100 lakes from federal management
and turn control over to local, state and corporate interests.
This is the most egregious legislation currently being advanced by
the American Recreation Coalition and under no circumstances must
this program be allowed to proceed beyond the study
phase.
|
|
Recreation
Lakes
Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|